Sorry, but Chernoff is totally unethical and he knows exactly what he is doing and that his comments would be objected to and sustained but gets them out there.
Dr. Schafer based his opinion on Dr. White saying MJ had swallowed propofol period and was disappointed in his fellow professional. Nothing wrong with that either.
Sorry, but Chernoff is totally unethical and he knows exactly what he is doing and that his comments would be objected to and sustained but gets them out there.
Dr. Schafer based his opinion on Dr. White saying MJ had swallowed propofol period and was disappointed in his fellow professional. Nothing wrong with that either.
I missed some of the latest, I was on my way home. Did I just hear defense ask witness if he went further and then shoved it down Dr. White's perfessional throat? And then defense withdrew the question. Trying to play dirty now, I don't think the judge will let defense go down this road.
The judge got upset with Dr. Shafer. Please just answer the questions!!! I don't think that Dr. Shafer is as confident with this kind of questioning. I don't know where this is going to go but I have a icky feeling in my tummy. I wonder what the jury is thinking.
I think Dr Schafer is just trying not to get forced into admitting things he did not really say or do. Chernoff is good at asking and framing questions in a fake way, forcing a yes/no answer that is unfair, imo.
So Chernoff is really good at mocking and accusing and acting 'shocked' at how stupid Dr Schafer is. I hope the jury can see through this charade.
I like how Schafer said " Oh, I will look up the testimony and see why I made that assumption...and Chernoff says " Oh No, you don't have to do that, let's move on. "
So I am guessing there was a good reason for Schafer to make that assumption in the first place. Chernoff was not taking any chances.
I think Dr Schafer is just trying not to get forced into admitting things he did not really say or do. Chernoff is good at asking and framing questions in a fake way, forcing a yes/no answer that is unfair, imo.
That is what cross examination is! Dr. Shafer should just say "I cannot give a simple yes or no answer to that". I wish Walgren had prepped him a bit better.
He is good at what he does, I can see why Murray hired him. If I was the defendant I would be glad he was on my side. But I am not the defendant, I am a bystander that is loosing patience with this questioning. I have come to really like this witness and it is making me upset that defense is trying to discredit him. I hope the jury has come to like this witness and is upset with defense too.