Coronavirus COVID-19 - Global Health Pandemic #110

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
i am 6 months since my last booster and i find myself hesitating to get the bivalent--
there is also the issue of a possible link between the Pfizer vaccine and cases
of stroke in people over 65 years old- though they say Moderna is not involved
with this potential link
When I want to book a bivalent vaccine, my choices today are Moderna BA.1 or Pfizer BA.4/5. Vaccine including variant BA.4/5 is recommended for XBB, but some provinces are instead offering Moderna BA.1 vaccine.

We can see in the CBC variant/mutation graph that BA.2, leading to BA.4/5, leading to XBB is where the vaccine is needed. Moderna BA.4/5 is not available, and Pfizer has some health risks.
 

Attachments

  • 1674183863563.png
    1674183863563.png
    215.2 KB · Views: 2
  • 1674184142776.png
    1674184142776.png
    137.9 KB · Views: 2

Primary series vaccination

For primary series vaccination, three monovalent COVID-19 vaccines (listed in alphabetical order by manufacturer), are recommended: Moderna, Novavax, and Pfizer-BioNTech.

Bivalent mRNA vaccines are not authorized at this time for primary series doses with the following exception: children ages 6 months–4 years who receive 2 primary series doses of a monovalent Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine should receive a bivalent Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine as their third primary series dose.


If I understand this correctly, a person needs to take the primary series of vaccinations before getting the bivalent booster, so I guess that means that monovalent vaccines are still available for those individuals. I would assume that they are Omicron targeted vaccines, and not the original series that we had before the Omicron variant surfaced. But they would be monovalent Omicron vaccines, not the bivalent.

Just my interpretation of what I am reading at this CDC link.

ETA the above quote from the linked CDC article
 
When I want to book a bivalent vaccine, my choices today are Moderna BA.1 or Pfizer BA.4/5. Vaccine including variant BA.4/5 is recommended for XBB, but some provinces are instead offering Moderna BA.1 vaccine.

We can see in the CBC variant/mutation graph that BA.2, leading to BA.4/5, leading to XBB is where the vaccine is needed. Moderna BA.4/5 is not available, and Pfizer has some health risks.
I wouldn't say the Pfizer bivalent vaccine has some health risks. I would say it may be associated with a risk of stroke in some elderly people.


Excerpt (BBM):
Unger: Well, let's get right into it. What do we know about this possible link between the updated Pfizer booster and increased risk of stroke?

Dr. Fryhofer: A new preliminary safety concern and increase in stroke risk has been identified for those 65 and older after receiving a dose of Pfizer's bivalent booster. Now, I want to be clear. There is no established link. This is just an early safety signal and one of many vaccine safety monitoring platforms. And on Friday the 13th of January, CDC and FDA made this joint announcement that an increased risk of stroke had been identified for those 65 and older who had received Pfizer's Omicron bivalent booster.

The preliminary signal found an increased risk of ischemic stroke and the 21 days following the Pfizer bivalent vaccine dose as compared with days 22 to 42 following vaccination. As I said, this is just a signal. The signal has only been seen for Pfizer's bivalent vaccine, not for Moderna's bivalent version. And the signal is only from one vaccine safety platform, VSD. That CDC's vaccine safety data link. And there are multiple different platforms which look at vaccine safety in different ways.

This signal has not been seen in the other vaccine safety platforms. Again, no other safety systems have shown this signal. So this may be a false alarm, or it could turn out to be real. Only time and further study and more data will tell.
 

Primary series vaccination

For primary series vaccination, three monovalent COVID-19 vaccines (listed in alphabetical order by manufacturer), are recommended: Moderna, Novavax, and Pfizer-BioNTech.

Bivalent mRNA vaccines are not authorized at this time for primary series doses with the following exception: children ages 6 months–4 years who receive 2 primary series doses of a monovalent Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine should receive a bivalent Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine as their third primary series dose.


If I understand this correctly, a person needs to take the primary series of vaccinations before getting the bivalent booster, so I guess that means that monovalent vaccines are still available for those individuals. I would assume that they are Omicron targeted vaccines, and not the original series that we had before the Omicron variant surfaced. But they would be monovalent Omicron vaccines, not the bivalent.

Just my interpretation of what I am reading at this CDC link.

ETA the above quote from the linked CDC article
That's my understanding of the quote : children should receive two doses of the original covid vaccine, and a third dose with the bivalent. Did smallpox or measles vaccines have more than one shot?

Adults have to decide for themselves. I had the first vaccine and two boosters. Now the bivalent vaccine? I want to research the reason that bivalent mRNA vaccines were not used earlier - if only to eradicate the common cold, ebola and viral hemorrhagic fever. If the mRNA vaccine is safe, like the smallpox vaccine that prevented the entire population from getting sick, why wasn't it rolled out before a pandemic?
 
I wouldn't say the Pfizer bivalent vaccine has some health risks. I would say it may be associated with a risk of stroke in some elderly people.


Excerpt (BBM):
Unger: Well, let's get right into it. What do we know about this possible link between the updated Pfizer booster and increased risk of stroke?

Dr. Fryhofer: A new preliminary safety concern and increase in stroke risk has been identified for those 65 and older after receiving a dose of Pfizer's bivalent booster. Now, I want to be clear. There is no established link. This is just an early safety signal and one of many vaccine safety monitoring platforms. And on Friday the 13th of January, CDC and FDA made this joint announcement that an increased risk of stroke had been identified for those 65 and older who had received Pfizer's Omicron bivalent booster.

The preliminary signal found an increased risk of ischemic stroke and the 21 days following the Pfizer bivalent vaccine dose as compared with days 22 to 42 following vaccination. As I said, this is just a signal. The signal has only been seen for Pfizer's bivalent vaccine, not for Moderna's bivalent version. And the signal is only from one vaccine safety platform, VSD. That CDC's vaccine safety data link. And there are multiple different platforms which look at vaccine safety in different ways.

This signal has not been seen in the other vaccine safety platforms. Again, no other safety systems have shown this signal. So this may be a false alarm, or it could turn out to be real. Only time and further study and more data will tell.
And that takes us back to the question of whether people age 60 and older should risk ischemic stroke as a side effect of the vaccine, or risk heart&stroke due to illness - which the vaccine does not prevent. It sounds a bit like the AstraZeneca vaccine, which we have heard has a higher risk of heart issues, skin rash and other toxifying symptoms - yet distribution was not halted. Is that what we're looking at here? A calculated risk?
 
I wouldn't say the Pfizer bivalent vaccine has some health risks. I would say it may be associated with a risk of stroke in some elderly people.


Excerpt (BBM):
Unger: Well, let's get right into it. What do we know about this possible link between the updated Pfizer booster and increased risk of stroke?

Dr. Fryhofer: A new preliminary safety concern and increase in stroke risk has been identified for those 65 and older after receiving a dose of Pfizer's bivalent booster. Now, I want to be clear. There is no established link. This is just an early safety signal and one of many vaccine safety monitoring platforms. And on Friday the 13th of January, CDC and FDA made this joint announcement that an increased risk of stroke had been identified for those 65 and older who had received Pfizer's Omicron bivalent booster.

The preliminary signal found an increased risk of ischemic stroke and the 21 days following the Pfizer bivalent vaccine dose as compared with days 22 to 42 following vaccination. As I said, this is just a signal. The signal has only been seen for Pfizer's bivalent vaccine, not for Moderna's bivalent version. And the signal is only from one vaccine safety platform, VSD. That CDC's vaccine safety data link. And there are multiple different platforms which look at vaccine safety in different ways.

This signal has not been seen in the other vaccine safety platforms. Again, no other safety systems have shown this signal. So this may be a false alarm, or it could turn out to be real. Only time and further study and more data will tell.

I read today that the EU has not identified any data that suggests a risk of stroke for elderly individuals who take the Pfizer bivalent vaccine. So that is good news. I don't have a link, heard this discussion on the radio earlier today.
 
And that takes us back to the question of whether people age 60 and older should risk ischemic stroke as a side effect of the vaccine, or risk heart&stroke due to illness - which the vaccine does not prevent. It sounds a bit like the AstraZeneca vaccine, which we have heard has a higher risk of heart issues, skin rash and other toxifying symptoms - yet distribution was not halted. Is that what we're looking at here? A calculated risk?
I believe the fact that this safety signal has appeared in only one of many safety platforms makes it likely that there is little or no risk involved. But more data will be helpful. Remember that the bivalent vaccine greatly reduces the risk of hospitalization in the elderly.

Updated bivalent (two-strain) mRNA booster shots, which target the Omicron BA.4/BA.5 sublineages of COVID-19 and the original strain, cut the risk of contracting severe COVID-19 by up to 57%, according to a study published in Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report today, but most Americans have yet to get the shot since they were made available on Sep 1.

A second study today in the same journal shows the bivalent boosters are particularly effective at preventing hospitalizations in elderly Americans.

(snip)
The second study, based on data from 22 hospitals in 18 states participating in the IVY Network, shows the bivalent booster offers even more protection to adults ages 65 and older whose immune systems are not compromised.

(snip)
The authors said their findings should reinforce the importance of bivalent boosters for older adults, who are most at risk for severe outcomes of COVID-19 infections. Currently bivalent booster dose coverage in the United States remains low among adults, with only 16% of those aged 18 to 64 boosted, and 36% of those 65 and older.

"All eligible persons, especially adults aged ≥65 years, should receive a bivalent booster dose to maximize protection against COVID-19 hospitalization this winter season," the authors concluded.
 
I believe the fact that this safety signal has appeared in only one of many safety platforms makes it likely that there is little or no risk involved. But more data will be helpful. Remember that the bivalent vaccine greatly reduces the risk of hospitalization in the elderly.

Updated bivalent (two-strain) mRNA booster shots, which target the Omicron BA.4/BA.5 sublineages of COVID-19 and the original strain, cut the risk of contracting severe COVID-19 by up to 57%, according to a study published in Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report today, but most Americans have yet to get the shot since they were made available on Sep 1.

A second study today in the same journal shows the bivalent boosters are particularly effective at preventing hospitalizations in elderly Americans.

(snip)
The second study, based on data from 22 hospitals in 18 states participating in the IVY Network, shows the bivalent booster offers even more protection to adults ages 65 and older whose immune systems are not compromised.

(snip)
The authors said their findings should reinforce the importance of bivalent boosters for older adults, who are most at risk for severe outcomes of COVID-19 infections. Currently bivalent booster dose coverage in the United States remains low among adults, with only 16% of those aged 18 to 64 boosted, and 36% of those 65 and older.

"All eligible persons, especially adults aged ≥65 years, should receive a bivalent booster dose to maximize protection against COVID-19 hospitalization this winter season," the authors concluded.
Exactly. The covid bivalent BA.4/5 vaccine is recommended for the highly contagious XBB covid variant that is currently circulating the planet. There are no concerns with the Moderna bivalent BA.4/5 vaccine, there have been questions about risk associated with the Pfizer BA.4/5 vaccine. The Moderna 4/5 option is not available in some parts of Canada. Guinea pig science?
 
Here is a link to article that states neither Israel nor the European Union have identified stroke risk in people over 65 who have received the Pfizer bivalent vaccine.

 
Last edited:
Here is a link to article that states neither Israel nor the European Union have identified stroke risk in people over 65 who have received the Pfizer bivalent vaccine.

Where did this concern come from if not from stats about people over 65 who suffered ischemic stroke 3 weeks after vaccination? If it is not an actual concern, why is it only pfizer?
 
I know of at least one couple who has kept one person well while the other had covid.

Separation and masking in the house, separate beds, separate bathrooms if possible and frequent cleaning if not, etc. Hope you stay well @weepingangel !
I didn’t take any preventative measures when my husband was diagnosed with COVID (like sleep in a separate bed, wear a mask, or use a separate bathroom) because I figured I’d already been exposed to the virus at that point. I took three at-home COVID tests (day 1, day 3, and day 7), and they were all negative. We’re in our early 40s and were vaccinated and boosted at the same time.

From my point of view, nearly everything about this virus is so hit or miss. That’s what worries me the most about it. It’s like a crapshoot with the highest of stakes.
 
Where did this concern come from if not from stats about people over 65 who suffered ischemic stroke 3 weeks after vaccination? If it is not an actual concern, why is it only pfizer?

The alert came from one of the safety databases that is used by the CDC. It was not noticed in any other safety database at this time. These are safety monitoring platforms. Below is a good interview that explains the situation, from a link that @anneg posted above, post #546. It was helpful, IMO, in the understanding of this alert from the CDC. So I am posting it again, in response to your question.


I had the Moderna bivalent, but my husband had the Pfizer bivalent vaccine. If we had known this at the time, I think he would have had the Moderna vaccine as well, even though all his previous vaccinations had been with Pfizer. Just in case.

----------------------------------------------

Transcript​

Unger: Hello and welcome to the AMA Update video and podcast. Today, we're discussing new announcements from the FDA and CDC about a possible increased risk of stroke following the Pfizer bivalent COVID booster and what we know about the new XBB Omicron variant.

I'm joined today by AMA Board Chair Dr. Sandra Fryhofer who's also the AMA's liaison to ACIP, the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and a member of ACIP's COVID-19 vaccine workgroup. I'm Todd Unger, AMA's chief experience officer in Chicago. Dr. Fryhofer, thanks for joining us today.

Dr. Fryhofer: Todd, thanks for having me.

Unger: Well, let's get right into it. What do we know about this possible link between the updated Pfizer booster and increased risk of stroke?

Dr. Fryhofer: A new preliminary safety concern and increase in stroke risk has been identified for those 65 and older after receiving a dose of Pfizer's bivalent booster. Now, I want to be clear. There is no established link. This is just an early safety signal and one of many vaccine safety monitoring platforms. And on Friday the 13th of January, CDC and FDA made this joint announcement that an increased risk of stroke had been identified for those 65 and older who had received Pfizer's Omicron bivalent booster.

The preliminary signal found an increased risk of ischemic stroke and the 21 days following the Pfizer bivalent vaccine dose as compared with days 22 to 42 following vaccination. As I said, this is just a signal. The signal has only been seen for Pfizer's bivalent vaccine, not for Moderna's bivalent version. And the signal is only from one vaccine safety platform, VSD. That CDC's vaccine safety data link. And there are multiple different platforms which look at vaccine safety in different ways.

This signal has not been seen in the other vaccine safety platforms. Again, no other safety systems have shown this signal. So this may be a false alarm, or it could turn out to be real. Only time and further study and more data will tell.

Unger: Dr. Fryhofer, this announcement demonstrates a lot of transparency on behalf of the CDC and FDA. And it's especially important since the mRNA vaccine platform is somewhat new. And safety is being closely monitored and scrutinized. Tell us more about that.

Dr. Fryhofer: Well, I agree. Transparency is so important to encourage trust in the system and trust in vaccines. And that's why CDC and FDA made the joint decision to alert the public so early about this preliminary safety concern. But again, it's still unclear if this is a real signal or just an aberration.

We need more data. This preliminary signal has only been seen in just that one platform, VSD, CDC's Vaccine Safety Datalink. And the signal only applies to Pfizer bivalent updated vaccine. This signal has not been observed for Moderna.

Unger: So you said the possible stroke concern has been identified in one safety platform. Can you just for the perspective of folks out there, how many different safety platforms look at COVID vaccines?

Dr. Fryhofer: Well, there are several of them. And there's been no signal so far in the BA database. It has not been observed in the CMS database. It has not been observed in VAERS, which is CDC and FDA's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. In addition, Pfizer's global safety database has not indicated the safety concern is real, which seems to be a step ahead of us.

And vaccination administration has also not reported this finding. There have been no red flags from any of the other vaccine safety platforms indicating an increased risk of ischemic stroke. This preliminary signal has only been seen in just this one platform, CDC's Vaccine Safety Datalink.

Unger: So at this point, has the CDC made any changes to its COVID vaccine recommendations?

Dr. Fryhofer: No. There is no change in current recommendations. CDC continues to recommend everyone six months and older stay up to date on COVID vaccinations. And that includes getting a dose of the updated bivalent vaccine when eligible.

Unger: So what's the current evidence supporting COVID vaccination with the updated bivalent booster doses?

Dr. Fryhofer: Well, here's what we do know. Getting a dose of the updated vaccine, which is the bivalent vaccine, cuts the risk of hospitalization by nearly three-fold as compared to those previously vaccinated but not bivalently boosted. The updated COVID vaccine also reduces risk of death by COVID by nearly 19-fold as compared to those who are unvaccinated. To repeat, at least for now, there is no change in CDC recommendations for COVID vaccination. But for transparency, CDC and FDA wanted the public to be aware.

FDA described this finding to the media as listening to the radio and hearing static in the background. Now, static doesn't mean someone is really talking. This issue will be addressed at the upcoming VRBPAC meeting on January 26. VRBPAC is FDA's independent Vaccine and Related Biologicals Product Advisory Committee. So more to come.

Unger: So you outlined a lot of benefits, obviously, of getting the bivalent booster. In this case, there isn't—this transparency does engender confidence in the system. But I think it probably could be a little confusing to folks out there. So could you help us put this in context for everyone?

Dr. Fryhofer: Well, Todd, you are so right. And I respect and appreciate the transparency. But the announcement comes at a time when daily COVID deaths are rising and vaccine uptake remains low. CDC says only 16% of those age five and older have received the updated bivalent booster. This signal involves those age 65 and older. And this is group is one of the most vulnerable to complications from COVID. And only 39% of them have been bivalently boosted.

So this message is very confusing and a little scary if you only read the headline and not the fine print. And that's why we're talking today. And it may make some people afraid to get the updated shot. FDA told media outlets that if they continue to dig deeper, they hope the signal will disappear.

And, of course, that's my hope too. And I think everyone hopes that. But understand this preliminary safety signal is only for Pfizer, not for Moderna. Those who need a dose of updated vaccine and feel nervous about this announcement could go ahead now and get a Moderna dose of updated COVID vaccine. So there is another option.
 
Here is a new article/podcast from the American Medical Association, definitely worth reading IMO:

What doctors wish patients knew about COVID-19 reinfection​

 
And that takes us back to the question of whether people age 60 and older should risk ischemic stroke as a side effect of the vaccine, or risk heart&stroke due to illness - which the vaccine does not prevent. It sounds a bit like the AstraZeneca vaccine, which we have heard has a higher risk of heart issues, skin rash and other toxifying symptoms - yet distribution was not halted. Is that what we're looking at here? A calculated risk?
You may speak to your healthcare provider if you can take aspirin as a preventative measure.
 

Looks like Japan is on the verge of downgrading Covid-19 to level of the seasonal flu as they move forward with the opening of their economy.
 
I don't think I posted this article previously. IMO it's an important article about Long Covid and well worth reading. Abstract and link to a helpful (and disturbing) graphic (Figure 1) are below.

Review Article
Published: 13 January 2023
Long COVID: major findings, mechanisms and recommendations

Hannah E. Davis, Lisa McCorkell, Julia Moore Vogel & Eric J. Topol
Nature Reviews Microbiology (2023)

Abstract​

Long COVID is an often debilitating illness that occurs in at least 10% of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections. More than 200 symptoms have been identified with impacts on multiple organ systems. At least 65 million individuals worldwide are estimated to have long COVID, with cases increasing daily. Biomedical research has made substantial progress in identifying various pathophysiological changes and risk factors and in characterizing the illness; further, similarities with other viral-onset illnesses such as myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome have laid the groundwork for research in the field.

In this Review, we explore the current literature and highlight key findings, the overlap with other conditions, the variable onset of symptoms, long COVID in children and the impact of vaccinations. Although these key findings are critical to understanding long COVID, current diagnostic and treatment options are insufficient, and clinical trials must be prioritized that address leading hypotheses. Additionally, to strengthen long COVID research, future studies must account for biases and SARS-CoV-2 testing issues, build on viral-onset research, be inclusive of marginalized populations and meaningfully engage patients throughout the research process.

 
That's my understanding of the quote : children should receive two doses of the original covid vaccine, and a third dose with the bivalent. Did smallpox or measles vaccines have more than one shot?

Adults have to decide for themselves. I had the first vaccine and two boosters. Now the bivalent vaccine? I want to research the reason that bivalent mRNA vaccines were not used earlier - if only to eradicate the common cold, ebola and viral hemorrhagic fever. If the mRNA vaccine is safe, like the smallpox vaccine that prevented the entire population from getting sick, why wasn't it rolled out before a pandemic?

I’m out of the age group for the smallpox vaccine so I don’t know how many vaccines were in that series, but MMR is a two dose series in the child vaccination schedule.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
108
Guests online
465
Total visitors
573

Forum statistics

Threads
608,343
Messages
18,237,970
Members
234,348
Latest member
Allira93
Back
Top