Gardener1850
Timeline Guru (Still Remembering Cupcake)
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2016
- Messages
- 42,100
- Reaction score
- 117,528
If doing it themselves, I doubt the results will be accurate. I understand you have to swab painfully deep to get an accurate result.
This may be the less invasive test.
I wasn’t aware there was a less invasive test. I don’t understand how one test can only get results by cramming the swab halfway to your brain while there’s another test that only requires a tickle.
Right. I read that if it didn’t bring tears to your eyes, it wasn’t done right. So I’m very confused.
This is the sheet I got at GA Tech when I was tested. I went deep. It was not pleasant, but what's the point of testing if the instructions are not correct?
I thought it was supposed to be a nasopharyngeal swab. Not a nostril swab.
I was neg.
Moo
View attachment 243840 View attachment 243839
The FDA recently changed the testing procedures and type of swabs that are acceptable in order to ramp up testing ability. It was addressed in one of the White House press conferences a few days ago. I looked but couldn't find which presser had it but I found this article that explains the changes: To speed coronavirus testing, FDA greenlights a new type of nasal swab
From the link:
On Thursday [Apr 16, 2020], the Food and Drug Administration announced that it would allow a broader range of swabs to be used in tests, including some made of polyester that should be far easier to manufacture.
[...]
The FDA also announced that US Cotton, the country’s largest manufacturer of cotton swabs, has developed a polyester-based swab fully compatible with Covid-19 testing. The firm plans to manufacture the swabs in “large quantities,” the FDA said.
[...]
The FDA on Thursday [Apr 16, 2020] took other steps that could help speed up diagnostic testing. It now says that a sample can be collected simply by circling the swab in the nose, instead of sticking a longer swab much deeper into the throat through a nostril. That process is deeply uncomfortable and causes patients to sneeze, meaning that health care providers need to be wearing full protective gear.
The agency also said the swab can be done by a patient, instead of by a health care professional. And instead of being stored in viral transport media, a special solution that is in short supply, the FDA also now said that it is OK to use saline solution, which is much more readily available, if necessary.
*Date in brackets added by me for clarity
ETA: It might have been covered in this presser from Apr 16th:
My DH and I were tested with the nasopharyngeal swab and it was very unpleasant to say the least. I was really happy to see they are accepting use of nasal swabs because I don't want to go through that again. MOO.