RANCH
United we stand, divided we fall.
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2008
- Messages
- 18,280
- Reaction score
- 39,115
So it appears that being outside is more dangerous than being inside of a building. Thanks.
So it appears that being outside is more dangerous than being inside of a building. Thanks.
So it appears that being outside is more dangerous than being inside of a building. Thanks.
our dog parks are closed
I would like to know if it's happening in certain cities vs others. I haven't heard of this happening in Sacramento where I live.I think it's happening in many places, and I doubt the patrons are elderly, meaning younger people either reject the idea they could get the virus or be a carrier or just don't care. I vote for the latter.
It's posted already but here it is again.I would like to know if it's happening in certain cities vs others. I haven't heard of this happening in Sacramento where I live.
Can you give an example of people going into crowded restaurants. JMO
I posted these photos in the mask making thread, but I think a whole lot of you who will need something like this won't see it there. The first photo is of button ear savers. You use them the way the nurse in the second photo is using the paper clip.Good for you for committing to find one you like better rather than throwing in the towel. I try to quiz my friends on FB who are complaining so I can find a solution for them.
So it appears that being outside is more dangerous than being inside of a building. Thanks.
Now I'm afraid of stopping at a red light with the window down in my truck. The people in the vehicles next to me could be sending the virus my way. JMOIt’s just not without risk. I only heard about this because a friend of mine who hikes and jobs posted about needing to be more careful than she had been.
So it appears that being outside is more dangerous than being inside of a building. Thanks.
But this seems to say that being outside is more dangerous.NO. The OPPOSITE. I would say that is certain. That's why it's so bad in New York City. Just follow the hotspots and look at the places with low rates. Indoor situations are BY FAR worse.
That's the whole thing about viruses in a nutshell. They are tiny and airborne. They go drifting done to the ground and are blown by moving air. In a building with any kind of ventilation (any air movement at all), it just stays in the building and finds new hosts among others in the building.
Outdoors, it is more dispersed, but still contagious. Nursing homes are the single largest place where people have died - and that's including some people below 60 who are in memory care. Hospitals have infected doctors and nurses.
Outdoors is safer. That's why you're reading about WSers visiting with Mom on decks or in backyards - more than 6 feet apart. Not 100% safe, but WAY safer than sitting in Mom's living room.
BTW, there are still "slipstreams" when people walk in buildings - it's just that people seem to think outdoors is completely safe and it's not.
Watching a largish gathering on Times Square right now, some kind of ceremony, and it looks as if about 10% are not following the Governor's orders about masks and 80% are not staying 6 feet apart.
IMO the health workers need both as they are working indoors in close contact with known infected patients. The general public in an outdoor environment are much less likely to be infected. In an indoor environment maybe yes, as Germany have required. Have any US states mandated masks to be worn either indoors or outside?
(ETA just seen the Massachusets mask rule posted by weeping angel )
I didn't see it posted before.It's posted already but here it is again.
Castle Rock restaurant reopens in defiance of statewide public health order
2 tests in 1 day. One negative, one positive. Will be retested tomorrow.
Coronavirus updates: Joint Chiefs of Staff member gets conflicting test results
Now I'm afraid of stopping at a red light with the window down in my truck. The people in the vehicles next to me could be sending the virus my way. JMO
But Blocken’s findings also have drawn harsh criticism from some who think he’s trying to say it’s impossible for people to exercise outdoors at a time when -- after weeks of stay-at-home orders -- they mentally and physically need it most.But this seems to say that being outside is more dangerous.
The paper, entitled Social Distancing v2.0: During Walking, Running and Cycling, found walkers should keep at least 4m clear when following others, runners should stay 10m from one another other, and fast cyclists should ride as much as 20m apart, in order to avoid passing through “droplet clouds” from others exercising.
“The slipstream is the zone that arises right behind a person when they are walking or cycling, and which pulls the air a bit along with this moving person, as it were,” said Professor Bert Blocken, who led the research. “Cyclists like to position themselves in the slipstream of others to reduce their air resistance. But someone who walks or runs also has such a slipstream. We have seen that no matter how that zone forms, droplets end up in that air stream. So it’s best to avoid that slipstream.”
Walkers, runners and cyclists warned to avoid ‘slipstreams’
Yes, I dont understand why the State feels they have reason for people to enter the tribal lands if the tribe wants to quarantine themselves. What business to non-natives have that requires them to be on tribal land?I don't blame them either. Both tribes have issued strict stay-at-home orders and curfews for their communities, unlike Noem who has has not issued a stay-at-home order for the state.
Sounds like the Sioux tribes are doing more to prevent the spread of the virus than the governor. Good for them. Leave them alone.