I don't think there is a time limit by the State if he waived his right to speedy trial. Oddly I don't think his legal team has filed to dismiss the case either which always baffled me given the amt of time that has passed? I don't recall how he filed his case as i'm guessing that he waived right to speedy trial. I'll add that question to my list as I honestly don't recall how those early hearings went. He also iirc was the contact connection to the apparently crooked car dealer (might have been Armenian but I'd have to go back and check) and then there is the current case he is involved with iirc where he provided a mortgage or something along those lines to a convicted child *advertiser censored* purveyor. I read the highlights of that one is its classic KM imo. KM seemed to know the underbelly of Hartford area and by all accounts he shared his contact list with FD. I've never gotten the feeling that KM was a cooperating witness in a traditional sense but perhaps the State is keeping him on a short leash for reasons that might not be clear to us as outsiders? IDK but its certainly an odd way to treat someone accused of a serious crime. I do wonder how many people in KM category exist on the CT Judiciary docket? My guess is not that many even though the system doesn't work on a good day imo.TY for sharing this background. I've only heard via attorney neighbors that his reputation as a lawyer is/was quite tainted. As far as his criminal case associated with Jennifer Farber, it took 8 months to arrest him and it’s been 4 years and 6+ months since the arrest date that he’s been on the docket for a trial (in/out of prison and chronic GPS monitor, which can't be comfortable). How long can a defendant be on the docket for a trial that is never scheduled in the State of Connecticut?
MOO
Dulos defendant Kent Mawhinney sues convicted child sex offender over defaulted mortgage
Kent Mawhinney, charged in the Jennifer Dulos disappearance, has filed a lawsuit against...
www.ctinsider.com