Silver Alert CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #28

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
@kimch33kim! Thanks for this! Shocking that there isn't anything listed for Atty. P. But that might just change depending on what happens with the Jones affidavit situation.
MOO
Yes, I hope he will be reprimanded in some way. Unfortunately, it seems like he always gets away with things do to his "connections". Sigh
 
Omg. I’m way behind! Did FD get a new Atty?
Haha! @Bulldogs2, FD is now party to another civil case in the form of the foreclosure action on 4Jx. SO, he had to find himself yet another member of the FD team of 'bad boys of CT law' to join: Atty. Pattis, Atty. Smith, Atty. Murray, Atty. Habib, Atty. Rochlin and Atty. Mawhinney/Atty. Markowitz. One or more of FD's prior atty's has been trying to resign from Civil Court but its not clear that it has been approved by the court. IF you recall FD's atty's at the time of the original AW attempted to resign 'en masse' and of those original atty's I think the only longstanding atty's remaining with FD are Atty. Mawhinney and Atty Markowitz (did FD real estate transaction work and is agent of FORE per Sec of State info posted earlier today).

Here is SA article about the various atty's resigning:
Lawyers looking to drop Fotis Dulos in divorce case, loan lawsuit
MOO
 
Last edited:
So let me get this straight. MT and her x lover GB purchased a vail CO condo in 2018. Now by this time she was hot and heavy with FD. Why did they purchase that?
Its unclear. Guesses have included having a place for MT/Begue daughter to train and also a place to allow Begue to ski year round, and possible location for MT/FD second 'home'. If I missed any of the prior theories just add them on. MOO
 
Soooo, if they don’t get around to charging FD with murder, what happens with the evidence tampering cases? Will be difficult to proceed very far on those and start trying to prove that case without dropping the hammer and going for the murder case I fear. I practiced civilly and not criminally so I have never encountered a situation like this. But if tampering is based on an underlying felony and there is no charged felony it just seems problematic with a jury. I think NP’s ponytailed mini-me was arguing this insofar as the motion to dismiss, but I believe that will fail bc the issuing judge on the arrest warrant found probable cause. But not sure how that applies to an actual adjudication on the merits of the tampering cases at trial. Motions to dismiss are difficult to win, but seems like could be a valid issue to raise in a tampering trial. Thoughts?
 
Soooo, if they don’t get around to charging FD with murder, what happens with the evidence tampering cases? Will be difficult to proceed very far on those and start trying to prove that case without dropping the hammer and going for the murder case I fear. I practiced civilly and not criminally so I have never encountered a situation like this. But if tampering is based on an underlying felony and there is no charged felony it just seems problematic with a jury. I think NP’s ponytailed mini-me was arguing this insofar as the motion to dismiss, but I believe that will fail bc the issuing judge on the arrest warrant found probable cause. But not sure how that applies to an actual adjudication on the merits of the tampering cases at trial. Motions to dismiss are difficult to win, but seems like could be a valid issue to raise in a tampering trial. Thoughts?
I am quite certain a murder charge is forthcoming. We have seen some very frustrating actions in the courtroom, but I have no doubt the state knows what it is doing.
 
It didn't seem to me that Judge Blawie was very convinced by NP's argument about the underlying felony.

We know something happened to JD and FD was disposing of evidence that could have led to whatever happened to her. If MT or KW or a random stranger were to be charged further down the road for her murder, FD would still be charged with tampering.

I don't see the reasoning behind the predicating felony. Just my very, very humble opinion.
 
It didn't seem to me that Judge Blawie was very convinced by NP's argument about the underlying felony.

We know something happened to JD and FD was disposing of evidence that could have led to whatever happened to her. If MT or KW or a random stranger were to be charged further down the road for her murder, FD would still be charged with tampering.

I don't see the reasoning behind the predicating felony. Just my very, very humble opinion.

And wouldn’t it be a bad message to send all future criminals-“If your hindering and tampering is really really first-rate, and no other felony charge is ever possible, then you’re home free boys and girls! Well done!”
 
Haha! @Bulldogs2, FD is now party to another civil case in the form of the foreclosure action on 4Jx. SO, he had to find himself yet another member of the FD team of 'bad boys of CT law' to join: Atty. Pattis, Atty. Smith, Atty. Murray, Atty. Habib, Atty. Rochlin and Atty. Mawhinney/Atty. Markowitz. One or more of FD's prior atty's has been trying to resign from Civil Court but its not clear that it has been approved by the court. IF you recall FD's atty's at the time of the original AW attempted to resign 'en masse' and of those original atty's I think the only longstanding atty's remaining with FD are Atty. Mawhinney and Atty Markowitz (did FD real estate transaction work and is agent of FORE per Sec of State info posted earlier today).

Here is SA article about the various atty's resigning:
Lawyers looking to drop Fotis Dulos in divorce case, loan lawsuit
MOO
Omg thank you so much! I work in a major hospital dealing with people with mental health issues and have not had time to catch Up! We can spot them a mile away!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
128
Guests online
297
Total visitors
425

Forum statistics

Threads
609,761
Messages
18,257,677
Members
234,754
Latest member
Otisandfitz
Back
Top