@Seattle1, I just keep thinking about the bankruptcy angle for FORE and if the veil is pierced (I don't think Weinstein should have any issues proving this issue at all given the slipshod practices etc.) then bankruptcy isn't an option as it opens up pandoras box in terms of all the funds that FD most likely has lifted over the years.
I am curious though also about a possible forced liquidation of FORE or even forced FORE or FD bankruptcy and wonder if that is the direction that Atty. Weinstein is headed if any eventual judgment isn't paid in a timely fashion by FD/FORE?
The bankruptcy angle by Atty. Weinstein might also be quite interesting to see play out as it would effectively turn over a good portion of any financial decision making to the court and FD would lose the ability to continue to play his financial 'shell game'. Perhaps this is why the 2 vehicles from Greece were brought over to possibly give some cash to keep the 'shell game' going in the event of a forced bankruptcy? IDK. Federal intervention is the FD/FORE situation would be welcomed on many levels as it might stop some of the lax State treatment of ongoing compliance issues from FD/FORE. Quickbooks from FORE were due in 2018 and have never been turned over despite a court order to do so?!?
The current civil litigation has GF/Atty. Weinstein suing both FD and FORE. I believe the 4Jx litigation is in the name of FD singly but I will have to double check.
The ongoing strategy of FD/Murray has been to delay delay and delay but the Judge seems to be holding firm on the December trial date so maybe we will see this all play out sooner rather than later.
MOO