afitzy
Former Member
- Joined
- May 12, 2019
- Messages
- 11,285
- Reaction score
- 126,557
I have to admit to being curious as to what Atty Bowman's next move might be with his client who seems incapable of telling the truth about much unless confronted with a photo or CCTV.She may be a tad conflicted after NP spoke out on that radio show today.
When he spoke about FD's suicide note proclaiming his great love and loyalty for MT.
Just today.
Was she listening?
Was her mother listening?
Moo.
Atty Bowman IMO has a tough row to hoe here with his client.
I do admit also to being fascinated about the Atty. P. claim via the alleged Fd 'suicide note' that Atty. P. has in his possession information to 'explain' Albany.
Atty. P. is of course doing his usual game of '3 card monte' about this information he has in his possession as his 'explanation' he provided as to exactly what he had didn't IMO inspire much confidence and could possibly only be understood by someone after downing 5 shots of tequila in rapid succession (assuming they don't have to go to the ER for alcohol poisoning). Long story short based on his comments on the radio, it didn't appear that the Atty. P. 'story' is anything but 'half baked' at this point. He has some info but not all. My guess is that Atty. P. is baking up a pancake with no leavening agent and it will of course fall quite flat.
Anyway, what is interesting is that because Fd, MT and KM are all co-conspirators and I believe might have been heading down the path of being tried together (Atty. P. I believe said this at one point so take that comment given the source!), I do wonder if we might see some legal wrangling as being possible between Atty Bowman and Atty. P. regarding the information on Albany. Not sure this can happen but I do wonder if Atty. P. has information that might possibly assist the MT defense whether he would share it with Atty Bowman. Atty. P. doesn't impress me as being a philanthropist so I'm not sure how any information sharing might work.
Absent a solid PI of his own to get information to save his client MT, I'm not sure Atty Bowman has much to work with. The additional evidence to be presented by the State for the Conspiracy charges might be compelling. The tampering and hindering charges seem fairly clear cut and the AW evidence also looks clear so it seems like the big question is will the Conspiracy to commit murder charge be further developed and how long could MT be looking at in terms of sentence, if convicted?
The idea that in AW 3 LE never shared whether it corroborated the MT alibi (she seemed to be working still off the alibi script) is something I find quite interesting. Everything so far on the alibi script for Fd and MT and KM has fallen apart so I have no reason to think that the MT alibi will be any different. IDK. Did she tell the truth about the morning of the murder or not? Is she on CCTV being someplace she shouldn't have been? My suspicion is yes, but we will see.
I still got the sense that LE was leaving open the possibility for MT cooperation after she wasted their time with lies for so many months. I guess we will have to wait. But, I'm not sure what MT has to bargain with and I also believe that she is exposed to so many other charges relating to her time at FORE. We still don't know also whether MT filed taxes in CT or the Federal Govt? We are aware of her involvement with the 123 Hunter Property.
The big question might just be civil litigation against MT by GF. I do wonder about the same thing for Fd/Estate as I'm not clear whether his estate could be sued by GF even simply to prove the point quite clearly that he was guilty. I'm not sure once the dust settles there will be a penny distributed to anyone in the Dulos estate and it sadly appears likely he dissipated and spent the JFd marital assets as he self destructed.
Still lots of complicated legal questions regarding how all these matters get settled. We now have action in Probate Court too and I'm not sure the MSM have provided any clarity on how that process will play out. Also, the Civil Litigation hasn't been resolved with Judge Noble (TICK TOCK Judge Noble) so that will be another major factor in terms of claims on Fd estate such as it is. What I do wonder though is that if the Fd assets were pledged as part of the bond then I would think that something has to be resolved regarding the bond and its claim on the Fd assets prior to resolution of any other unsecured claims.
MOO