Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes! Exactly! Table saw (?) included!Makes no sense. That looked like a scene clean up kit to me in back of white jeep! Moo
It might be that they new it wasn’t driven on the key dates.Makes no sense. That looked like a scene clean up kit to me in back of white jeep! Moo
The other vehicle is the RED truck with the extra seats in the cargo area.JS is objecting to a photo. Because there are other vehicles in the photo. Judge overrules.
Photos admitted
Was thinking late start today because JS reading this & needed to change to blue suit and perky tie …Haha! Humble, trustworthy and honest!
Good one! Thanks for the laugh on a day that got off to a rough start!
In the impound lot?The other vehicle is the RED truck with the extra seats in the cargo area.
Its actually one of the FEW things I like and enjoy about the Judge! Live for the sports analogies. Sadly I don't think TP understands them as the behaviour continues.LOL @ Judge and his sports analogies! Love it.
Couldn't find an image for an old style Divining Rod so came up with this as its effectively what TP is asking Judge to do with his various objections claiming that nothing or little the State has found relates to his client:JS clarifying. He isn't arguing they didn't do everything. He's arguing that their investigation was biased. JS says 99% of what is shown is irrelevant to the case.
Says it'll be confusing to the jury.
Judge refers to an exercise in divination. He cannot deternine what is relevant at this point. Upholds the process.
Overruled.
Recess until 11:35
Yes, but we don't know yet whether is internal computer or GPS system was analysed. Hope it was, if it existed.It might be that they new it wasn’t driven on the key dates.
Honestly, what is confusing is allowing Defence Counsel to make uncontested statements claiming that 99% of what is shown is irrelevant to the case IN FRONT OF THE JURY!JS clarifying. He isn't arguing they didn't do everything. He's arguing that their investigation was biased. JS says 99% of what is shown is irrelevant to the case.
Says it'll be confusing to the jury.
Judge refers to an exercise in divination. He cannot deternine what is relevant at this point. Upholds the process.
Overruled.
Recess until 11:35