CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, Media, Maps, Timeline, *NO DISCUSSION*
- Thread starter oviedo
- Start date
-
- Tags
- jennifer dulos
New Posts
-
GUILTY CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, deceased/not found, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #71
- Latest: I am not Sherlock H.
@jscheckerNBCCT
“For so long as (Fotis) is incarcerated the children should remain in the (grandma’s) custody...if the defendant is released on bond or otherwise it would be detrimental to the children, particularly in the midst of the investigation into the disappearance of their mother” #NBCCT
“For so long as (Fotis) is incarcerated the children should remain in the (grandma’s) custody...if the defendant is released on bond or otherwise it would be detrimental to the children, particularly in the midst of the investigation into the disappearance of their mother” #NBCCT
Blood Found in Home of Missing CT Mom, Affidavit Reveals
The document says the items left by FD, who has been in the midst of a contentious divorce and child custody battle with missing mother of five JD, were found inside five trash bins and tested positive for his wife's blood.
bbm
The document says the items left by FD, who has been in the midst of a contentious divorce and child custody battle with missing mother of five JD, were found inside five trash bins and tested positive for his wife's blood.
bbm
https://media.wtnh.com/nxs-wtnhtv-media-us-east-1/document_dev/2019/06/04/Jun 4, Doc 1_1559668712212_90689131_ver1.0.pdf
JD's mother files for custody.
JD's mother files for custody.
Last edited:
Police Search for Possible Body in Connecticut River in Suffield
Police Search for Possible Body in Connecticut River in Suffield
Police Search for Possible Body in Connecticut River in Suffield
Carmen Chau (@CChauFOX61) | Twitter
Enfield Police: Working to identify something about five feet down in the CT River but don’t know what it is yet. @FOX61News
Enfield Police: Working to identify something about five feet down in the CT River but don’t know what it is yet. @FOX61News
It’s on the Suffield. No comment from @SuffieldPolice ... waiting on more information @FOX61News
It’s on the Suffield side*... more details to come
2 replies 2 retweets 0 likes
Samara AbramsonVerified account @Samara_AbramsonIt’s on the Suffield side*... more details to come
2 replies 2 retweets 0 likes
Mannequin recovered in Enfield, CT
Updated to include stmt from State Police: Officials say a mannequin was recovered in the CT River in Suffield
Updated to include stmt from State Police: Officials say a mannequin was recovered in the CT River in Suffield
Author credit is @gitana1
Regarding custody and supervised visitation :
Okay. So this clears it up. Per the current petition to intervene on behalf of the grandmother, the father, FD, did NOT have unsupervised access to the kids and that was not coming up.
From the time of the dissolution action in late June 2012,we don't know what the exact custody orders were. But we know he had a lot of access, per news reports.
But in January 2018 and March 2018, per two different court orders, (January was probably a temporary, emergency order pending the hearing on March 1, 2018 when the court stated, "the court does not find the defendant to be credible. The defendant does not seem to appreciate in any respect the consequences of lying under oath and willfully violating a court order. His facility in testifying falsely to the court suggests that he is equally comfortable in encouraging the children to lie and achieve his desired outcome"), the father's visits were totally suspended. That's unusual. I am guessing it was at both hearings that experts were appointed to asses the case and the best interests of the kids, because that would be logical and because the court also found, as the March 1, 2018 order indicates, that there was an immediate risk of psych harm to the kids and she cites the GAL's input.
Starting in June 2018, the father had limited, supervised access to the kids, between June 2018 and March 2019.
Per the grandmother's motion, at a hearing on March 20, 2019, "the court issued a decision affording the defendant with certain on-going supervised access to the children, which he exercised between approximately March 20, 2019 and May 24, 2019." The motion then goes on to detail the very strict restrictions of that visitation,including not being allowed to be alone with the kids,speak Greek to them, disparage his ex or any of the court appointed personnel, etc.
This is exactly as the news reported.
There is no mention at all of the visits magically becoming unsupervised for Memorial Day weekend. It appears clear he had more time with the kids but not unsupervised access. It is also important that she is mentioning his restricted access, supervisions, etc., in connection with her request to intervene and be given custody of the kids. Because she's saying that his restrictions make granting her custody more reasonable , especially now that mom has disappeared and he probably killed her.
I hope that's all now clear and we can stop blaming the judge's court orders for the unrelated murder of Jennifer Farber.
https://media.wtnh.com/nxs-wtnhtv-m...un 4, Doc 1_1559668712212_90689131_ver1.0.pdf
Regarding custody and supervised visitation :
Okay. So this clears it up. Per the current petition to intervene on behalf of the grandmother, the father, FD, did NOT have unsupervised access to the kids and that was not coming up.
From the time of the dissolution action in late June 2012,we don't know what the exact custody orders were. But we know he had a lot of access, per news reports.
But in January 2018 and March 2018, per two different court orders, (January was probably a temporary, emergency order pending the hearing on March 1, 2018 when the court stated, "the court does not find the defendant to be credible. The defendant does not seem to appreciate in any respect the consequences of lying under oath and willfully violating a court order. His facility in testifying falsely to the court suggests that he is equally comfortable in encouraging the children to lie and achieve his desired outcome"), the father's visits were totally suspended. That's unusual. I am guessing it was at both hearings that experts were appointed to asses the case and the best interests of the kids, because that would be logical and because the court also found, as the March 1, 2018 order indicates, that there was an immediate risk of psych harm to the kids and she cites the GAL's input.
Starting in June 2018, the father had limited, supervised access to the kids, between June 2018 and March 2019.
Per the grandmother's motion, at a hearing on March 20, 2019, "the court issued a decision affording the defendant with certain on-going supervised access to the children, which he exercised between approximately March 20, 2019 and May 24, 2019." The motion then goes on to detail the very strict restrictions of that visitation,including not being allowed to be alone with the kids,speak Greek to them, disparage his ex or any of the court appointed personnel, etc.
This is exactly as the news reported.
There is no mention at all of the visits magically becoming unsupervised for Memorial Day weekend. It appears clear he had more time with the kids but not unsupervised access. It is also important that she is mentioning his restricted access, supervisions, etc., in connection with her request to intervene and be given custody of the kids. Because she's saying that his restrictions make granting her custody more reasonable , especially now that mom has disappeared and he probably killed her.
I hope that's all now clear and we can stop blaming the judge's court orders for the unrelated murder of Jennifer Farber.
https://media.wtnh.com/nxs-wtnhtv-m...un 4, Doc 1_1559668712212_90689131_ver1.0.pdf
Mountain Misst
FA in Aus.
Cadaver dogs at incinerator plant
https://nypost.com/2019/06/04/how-suspects-in-jennifer-dulos-case-handed-cops-their-big-break/
https://nypost.com/2019/06/04/how-suspects-in-jennifer-dulos-case-handed-cops-their-big-break/