Carioca
Member
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2011
- Messages
- 493
- Reaction score
- 5
Yes, this!Yes, PLEASE!!!!! The discussion needs to continue. A supreme injustice has been done and attention needs to remain on this case.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, this!Yes, PLEASE!!!!! The discussion needs to continue. A supreme injustice has been done and attention needs to remain on this case.
Looks like Plaintiffs' counsel tried (without following all the rules) to get Adam's doctor and employer to turn over records that are very protected under California law and would be mostly irrelevant to the issue of Adam's use of Ambien. The judge discussed the situation with the parties but hasn't issued a ruling yet. The judge also suggested a potentially more-relevant avenue of discovery (handwriting sample from Adam).
Looks like Plaintiffs' counsel tried (without following all the rules) to get Adam's doctor and employer to turn over records that are very protected under California law and would be mostly irrelevant to the issue of Adam's use of Ambien. The judge discussed the situation with the parties but hasn't issued a ruling yet. The judge also suggested a potentially more-relevant avenue of discovery (handwriting sample from Adam).
Thanks, AZlawyer! With regard to the Zahau family's attorneys seeking information from Adam's employer, do you agree that information about Adam's job skills and training, specifically his ability to tie nautical knots, be relevant to the case? Does that seem like something the judge should allow? TIA
Hi K_Z, Lash, screecher, Inparadise, etc :
I tried to register on KZ website but someone already registered under my name "Bourne" or "bourne".
I ended up registering as "~Bourne" with squiggly line before my name so y'all know this is me.
I'm thinking someone did that nefariously in an attempt to get inside info from y'all.
Re: Rebecca Zahau, et al. v. Adam Shacknai, cl al. SDSC Case No. 30-2013-00075418-CU-PO-CTL
Dear Mr. Miller:
As you are aware, we are counsel for Dina Shacknai in regard to the action entitled Rebecca Zahau, et al. v. Adam Shacknai, et al. and have served your client, Neil Nalepa, with a deposition subpoena for a date that has now passed. Currently, your Motion to Quash the subpoena is set to be heard on November 4, 2016 in Department 69 of the San Diego Superior Court Please allow this correspondence to act as our attempt to meet and confer on this motion in an attempt to either resolve the outstanding issues or advance the hearing date currently before the Court.
It appears from our review of your objection that you may not have been fully advised of the relevance of Mr. Nalepa's testimony in the wrongful death case brought by the family of his ex-wife, Rebecca Zahau. As you are aware, Mr. Nalepa was married to Rebecca Zahau from May 2002 until just a few months before her death. Even after the divorce, he continued to remain in contact with Ms. Zahau until a few days before her death and still has a close relationship with her family, the plaintiffs in this case, making his testimony extremely relevant to this litigation.
More specifically, please see the following areas of knowledge, with reference to the investigation into Rebecca's death, which would be relied upon by the Court in making its ruling on the protective order.
* Detective Tsuida relayed in her reports that after 2-3 years of marriage Rebecca left Neil and moved to San Diego. Rebecca dated a couple of men, but eventually reconciled with Neil and moved to Colorado. Things did not work out and Rebecca moved to Arizona. Neil eventually moved to Arizona and was living with Rebecca for a few months as a roommate, but Rebecca eventually asked him to move out. (See Follow-Up Investigative Report by Detective
* During interviews with Doug, Mary, Snowen and Timo, Detective Lebitski discovered that immediately following Rebecca's death, Mr. Nalepa flew from Arizona to attend a memorial at the Calvary Bible School in Murietta. Mr. Nalepa then came to the Sheriffs homicide office and was interviewed by Detectives Palmer and Lebitski. (See Follow-Up Investigative Report by Detective Lebitski.)
* During the recorded interview, Mr. Nalepa indicated that he found out about Rebecca's death from a news reporter. He relayed information regarding Rebecca's background and history of abuse, how they met, her personal and sleeping habits, and her infidelities during the marriage. He was very close to Rebecca's family and helped Mary through her divorce. He had last texted Rebecca on the Wednesday night of her death. Two weeks before, they had exchanged texts and Mr. Nalepa will have information regarding Rebecca's state of mind in the time leading up to her death. Further, during the interview, Mr. Nalepa voiced his opinion as to whether he believed Rebecca's death to bea suicide. (See Statement of Neil Nalepa.)
* During the time that Rebecca and Mr.Nalepa were separated, her then boyfriend filed a missing persons report with the Glendale California Police Department. These reports state that Rebecca had left Mr. Berger to resume her relationship with Mr. Nalepa (See Glendale Police Report.)
* At the time that the Zahau family members were deposed in Missouri in January 2015, Mr. Nalepa was visiting Rebecca's sisters, Xena and Mary. (Excerpts from the Depositions of Mary and Xena Zahau)
Based upon the foregoing, it is clear that not all of Mr. Nalepa's knowledge in this matter was gained during their marriage. His continued relationship with Rebecca and her family after the divorce is relevant to this civil case and his deposition is necessary. Therefore, it is our hope that you will agree to withdraw your objections to the deposition of Mr. Nalepa. In the alternative, we request that you agree to join us in moving ex parte to have the hearing date advanced so that Mr. Nalepa may be deposed prior to the filing of unrelated law and motion and before the commencement of trial preparation.
^ ...seconds after her suicde was responded to by EMTs and police. Seconds after her suicide, she was silent in the courtyard waiting for Jonah to come home and discover her and her angry painted message. (IMO)
The first link to this informative document did not seem to work, so here it is again.
ROA #437
https://roa.sdcourt.ca.gov/roa/face..._Motion_to_Compel_Discovery_1476690341306.pdf
Hi AZ Lawyer, I hope all is wellI wanted to ask, now that Dina and Nina have been dismissed from the case, can they sue the Zahaus for defamation of character? Also, does the judge have to allow a third amended complaint against Adam? Thank you so much
![]()