DC - Former President Donald Trump indicted, 4 federal counts in 2020 election interference, 1 Aug 2023, Trial 4 Mar 2024 #2

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

Democrats, who voted to impeach Donald Trump over his efforts to overturn the 2020 election and his role in the deadly Jan. 6 attack, had strong reactions to news of the former president's possible visit to the Capitol next week.

“Criminals tend to return to the scene of the crime,” Rep. Brendan Boyle, D-Pa., wrote on X.

“We will need extra security — not for him, but for members and staff and the personnel at the Capitol,” said Rep. Veronica Escobar, D-Texas, who was among those trapped in the House chamber during the Capitol attack.
 

Democrats, who voted to impeach Donald Trump over his efforts to overturn the 2020 election and his role in the deadly Jan. 6 attack, had strong reactions to news of the former president's possible visit to the Capitol next week.

“Criminals tend to return to the scene of the crime,” Rep. Brendan Boyle, D-Pa., wrote on X.

“We will need extra security — not for him, but for members and staff and the personnel at the Capitol,” said Rep. Veronica Escobar, D-Texas, who was among those trapped in the House chamber during the Capitol attack.
Sad that what Escobar says is very true
 
Docket updates:

Doc# Date Filed Description
65 Oct 2, 2023 Memorandum in Opposition by USA as to DONALD J. TRUMP re 62 Motion for Extension of Time to File CIPA Section 5 and Response to Ex Parte Notice (Windom, Thomas) (Entered: 10/02/2023) Main Document Memorandum in Opposition

66 Oct 2, 2023 Memorandum in Opposition by USA as to DONALD J. TRUMP re 63 Motion for Extension of Time to File Pretrial Motions (Windom, Thomas) (Entered: 10/02/2023) Main Document
Memorandum in Opposition

Oct 3, 2023 Set/Reset Deadlines

Oct 3, 2023 MINUTE ORDER as to DONALD J. TRUMP: By October 10, 2023, defense counsel John F. Lauro and Gregory M. Singer shall initiate and complete all security clearance tasks as directed by the Litigation Security Group of the U.S. Department of Justice, and thereafter file a Notice of Compliance by October 11, 2023. The Notice shall also state whether the defense anticipates that any other of its members, whose assistance is reasonably required, will need to obtain a security clearance. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 10/3/2023. (zjd)

Oct 3, 2023 .Order AND ~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines

Oct 3, 2023 Set/Reset Deadlines as to DONALD J. TRUMP: Notice of Compliance due by 10/11/2023. (mac)

Oct 4, 2023 .Order

Oct 4, 2023 MINUTE ORDER as to DONALD J. TRUMP: It is hereby ORDERED that court will hold an ex parte Classified Information Procedures Act hearing with the defense at a time and place arranged with defense counsel. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 10/4/2023. (zjd)

74 Oct 5, 2023 MOTION to Dismiss Case by DONALD J. TRUMP. (Lauro, John) (Entered: 10/05/2023) Main Document Dismiss Case

75 Oct 5, 2023 REPLY in Support by DONALD J. TRUMP re 63 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Pretrial Motions (Lauro, John) (Entered: 10/05/2023) Main Document Reply in Support

76 Oct 5, 2023 REPLY in Support by DONALD J. TRUMP re 62 MOTION for Extension of Time to File CIPA Sect. 5 and response to ex parte notice (Lauro, John) (Entered: 10/05/2023) Main Document Reply in Support


link: United States v. TRUMP, 1:23-cr-00257 - CourtListener.com
 
OPINION & ORDER
Before the court are Defendant’s Motion for Access to CIPA § 4 Filing and An
Adjournment of the CIPA § 5 Deadline, ECF No. 62 (“CIPA Motion”), and Motion for
Extension of Time to File Pretrial Motions, ECF No. 63 (“Extension Motion”). For the reasons
set forth below, the court will GRANT in part and DENY in part both Motions.

 

A coalition of media outlets is pushing the judge overseeing the election interference case of former President Trump to allow cameras in the courtroom — asking for an unprecedented shift in the federal court system.

“We have never, in the history of our Nation, had a federal criminal trial that warrants audiovisual access more than the federal prosecution of former President Trump for allegedly trying to subvert the will of the people,” according to the application, which was filed Thursday and first reported Friday.

“The prosecution of a former president, now a presidential contender, on charges of subverting the electoral process, presents the strongest possible circumstances for continuous public oversight of the justice system.”
 

Former President Donald Trump will not travel to Capitol Hill this week as House Republicans scramble to determine the next Speaker, a source familiar with the matter confirmed to The Hill.
 

Special counsel wants deadline for Trump to declare ‘advice of counsel’ defence in election conspiracy case​

In a new court filing, Special Counsel Jack Smith has asked the court to set a deadline for Donald Trump to declare if he will be using an “advice of counsel” defence in his federal 2020 election conspiracy criminal case.

If the former president is going to defend himself in this way, Smith says the prosecution is entitled to additional evidence and discovery. Trump lawyers have indicated in the media that they may pursue this line of defence.

“At least 25 witnesses withheld information, communications, and documents based on assertions of the attorney-client privilege,” the filing states.

Smith wants to keep the case moving swiftly and still wants the trial to begin in May 2024.
 
Lisa Rubin

@lawofruby

"NEW: Trump's team has moved to issue several pre-trial subpoenas for 'missing' documents from the Jan. 6 committee. In a footnote, however, they tell Judge Chutkan that they're not positive the documents they seek aren't in the government's discovery. 1/

Instead, they tell her they have a 'good faith basis' for believing they don't have them--and then fail to explain what steps they took to develop said 'good faith basis.' 'Trust me' is rarely a good strategy with a federal judge. 2/"

 
Lisa Rubin
@lawofruby

"NEW: Trump's team has moved to issue several pre-trial subpoenas for 'missing' documents from the Jan. 6 committee. In a footnote, however, they tell Judge Chutkan that they're not positive the documents they seek aren't in the government's discovery. 1/

Instead, they tell her they have a 'good faith basis' for believing they don't have them--and then fail to explain what steps they took to develop said 'good faith basis.' 'Trust me' is rarely a good strategy with a federal judge. 2/"


Translated ... "we don't want to look through all the documents already provided, so just give them to us separately. That should delay things a little bit more".

imo
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
119
Guests online
524
Total visitors
643

Forum statistics

Threads
608,256
Messages
18,236,913
Members
234,325
Latest member
davenotwayne
Back
Top