DC - Former President Donald Trump indicted, 4 federal counts in 2020 election interference, 1 Aug 2023, Trial 4 Mar 2024 #2

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

GRT said:
She likely will. If she's smart, and I think she is, she and her prosecutors would have been preparing behind the scenes for a while now. Still, I don't think it's possible to do much more than an evidentiary hearing before the election.

And, I have to wonder how much Chutkan has left to work with after SCOTUS ruling. I don't think she can use anything Trump or his advisors have said or anything in their private records. The following from the ruling will likely remove much of the evidence Chutkan would have used.

"On remand, the District Court must carefully analyze the indictment’s remaining allegations to determine whether they too involve conduct for which a President must be immune from prosecution. And the parties and the District Court must ensure that sufficient allegations support the indictment’s charges without such conduct. Testimony or private records of the President or his advisers probing such conduct may not be admitted as evidence at trial. Pp. 30–32."

All MOO
Click to expand...

I was trying to figure "which" counts will be vacated due to this ruling. Here is the indictment:


Violations:
Count 1: 18 U.S.C. S371 -Conspiracy to defraud the United States
Count 2: 18 U.S.C. S1512(k) -Conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding
Count 3: 18 U.S.C. SS1512(c)(2), 2 -Obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding
Count 4: 18 U.S.C. S241 -Conspiracy against rights


JMO - I think Counts 2 & 3...
 
SouthAussie said:
I guess she will need to decide if all of his very public and ongoing speech about "the election was stolen" amounts to behaviour within the bounds of the (former) presidency.

And if the more-than 60 lawsuits that he lost, challenging the election results, were within the bounds of the (former) presidency.

Because that may show the conspiracy. He didn't file those lawsuits all by himself.

It is really hard to tell. We all know he did conspire. Maybe Jack Smith has more evidence up his sleeve that does not involve his 'advisors'. Like the conversations overheard (and published) by other former WH staff.

imo
Click to expand...
What if the charges are dropped against him because undermining a fair election falls under presidential duties (help us all if that happens), but his co-conspirators still face charges and are found guilty. I wouldn't even be surprised at this point if he skates by with these crimes while the people around him fall.

jmo
 
Inthedetails said:
What if the charges are dropped against him because undermining a fair election falls under presidential duties (help us all if that happens), but his co-conspirators still face charges and are found guilty. I wouldn't even be surprised at this point if he skates by with these crimes while the people around him fall.

jmo
Click to expand...

I can't see how undermining a fair election would be a presidential duty. Challenges are fine, when they are done as a legitimate recount of votes. But undermining is a whole other thing. imo
 
ORDER as to DONALD J. TRUMP: Setting status conference for August 16, 2024 at 10:00 A.M. in Courtroom 9; requiring joint status report by August 9, 2024; denying without prejudice Defendant's 114 Motion to Dismiss the Indictment Based on Statutory Grounds; and staying briefing deadlines for the Government's 191 Motion in Limine and Motion for CIPA Section 6(a) Hearing. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/3/2024. (zjd) (Entered: 08/03/2024)


@Niner
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2726.jpeg
    IMG_2726.jpeg
    97.2 KB · Views: 3
Niner said:
I was trying to figure "which" counts will be vacated due to this ruling. Here is the indictment:


Violations:
Count 1: 18 U.S.C. S371 -Conspiracy to defraud the United States
Count 2: 18 U.S.C. S1512(k) -Conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding
Count 3: 18 U.S.C. SS1512(c)(2), 2 -Obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding
Count 4: 18 U.S.C. S241 -Conspiracy against rights


JMO - I think Counts 2 & 3...
Click to expand...
You could be right.

I think all of them are weakened by the ruling, but it will be interesting to see if any survive. Now, with the delay, there's virtually no way for a real trial before November. If Trump loses the election, we could see any surviving charges proceeding. If he wins, he'll get a four-year grace period. JMOO
 
SouthAussie said:
I can't see how undermining a fair election would be a presidential duty. Challenges are fine, when they are done as a legitimate recount of votes. But undermining is a whole other thing. imo
Click to expand...
Agree about undermining, though of course he will claim it wasn't that at all. And while legal challenges are... ...legal, I cannot see how it's an official duty of the president. It's a legal option all candidates have if they think the election was compromised. Nothing to do with whether any candidate happens to already be president. Being re-elected is NOT an official duty! If it's decided otherwise I will lose all respect for whoever decided that. MOO
 
Auntie Cipation said:
Agree about undermining, though of course he will claim it wasn't that at all. And while legal challenges are... ...legal, I cannot see how it's an official duty of the president. It's a legal option all candidates have if they think the election was compromised. Nothing to do with whether any candidate happens to already be president. Being re-elected is NOT an official duty! If it's decided otherwise I will lose all respect for whoever decided that. MOO
Click to expand...
Of course undermining isn't an official presidential duty. It's the opposite! But what DJT calls "challenging" went beyond legal and legit challenging and went into "undermining." (I assumed my use of the word "undermining" would be understood in that context.)

jmo
 
sds71 said:
ORDER as to DONALD J. TRUMP: Setting status conference for August 16, 2024 at 10:00 A.M. in Courtroom 9; requiring joint status report by August 9, 2024; denying without prejudice Defendant's 114 Motion to Dismiss the Indictment Based on Statutory Grounds; and staying briefing deadlines for the Government's 191 Motion in Limine and Motion for CIPA Section 6(a) Hearing. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/3/2024. (zjd) (Entered: 08/03/2024)


@Niner
Click to expand...

Thank you for the tag! :)
 
Oops - I have not kept up with the docket updates... :rolleyes:

Docket updates:

Doc# Date filed Description
200 Aug 2, 2024 MANDATE of USCA as to DONALD J. TRUMP re 179 Notice of Appeal - Interlocutory. In accordance with the Order filed on August 2, 2024, it is Ordered, on the court's own motion, that this case be remanded to the District Court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion. USCA Case Number 23-3228. (Attachments: # 1 USCA Order of 8/2/2024)(zstd) (Entered: 08/05/2024) Main Document USCA Mandate Attachment 1 USCA Order of 8/2/2024

197 Aug 3, 2024 ORDER as to DONALD J. TRUMP: Setting status conference for August 16, 2024 at 10:00 A.M. in Courtroom 9; requiring joint status report by August 9, 2024; denying without prejudice Defendant's 114 Motion to Dismiss the Indictment Based on Statutory Grounds; and staying briefing deadlines for the Government's 191 Motion in Limine and Motion for CIPA Section 6(a) Hearing. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/3/2024. (zjd) (Entered: 08/03/2024) Main Document Order on Motion to Dismiss Case

198 Aug 3, 2024 MEMORANDUM OPINION as to DONALD J. TRUMP re: Defendant's 116 Motion to Dismiss Case for Selective and Vindictive Prosecution. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/3/2024. (zjd) (Entered: 08/03/2024) Main Document Memorandum Opinion

199 Aug 3, 2024 ORDER as to DONALD J. TRUMP: Denying Defendant's 116 Motion to Dismiss Case for Selective and Vindictive Prosecution. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/3/2024. (zjd) (Entered: 08/03/2024) Main Document Order on Motion to Dismiss Case

201 Aug 6, 2024 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- Application for CVRA Relief dated 3/20/2024 as to DONALD J. TRUMP. Although courts have in rare instances exercised their discretion to permit third-party submissions in criminal cases, neither the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure nor the Local Criminal Rules contemplate that practice. Movant asserts a right to file on this docket under the Crime Victims Relief Act ("CVRA"), 18 U.S.C. § 3771. But they do not establish that they qualify as "victim" under the CVRA's statutory definition. See id. § 3771(e)(2); United States v. Giraldo-Serna, 118 F. Supp. 3d 377, 38283 (D.D.C. 2015). Consequently, the victim's rights enumerated in the CVRA do not attach, see 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a), and the court is not persuaded that it is appropriate to depart from the ordinary course and permit this filing. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/6/2024. (zstd) (Entered: 08/06/2024) Main Document Leave to File Denied

202 Aug 6, 2024 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- Application for CVRA Relief dated 4/2/2024 as to DONALD J. TRUMP. Although courts have in rare instances exercised their discretion to permit third-party submissions in criminal cases, neither the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure nor the Local Criminal Rules contemplate that practice. Movant asserts a right to file on this docket under the Crime Victims Relief Act ("CVRA"), 18 U.S.C. § 3771. But they do not establish that they qualify as "victim" under the CVRA's statutory definition. See id. § 3771(e)(2); United States v. Giraldo-Serna, 118 F. Supp. 3d 377, 38283 (D.D.C. 2015). Consequently, the victim's rights enumerated in the CVRA do not attach, see 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a), and the court is not persuaded that it is appropriate to depart from the ordinary course and permit this filing. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/6/2024. (zstd) (Entered: 08/06/2024) Main Document Leave to File Denied

203 Aug 6, 2024 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- Amended Application for CVRA Relief dated 6/13/2024 as to DONALD J. TRUMP. Although courts have in rare instances exercised their discretion to permit third-party submissions in criminal cases, neither the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure nor the Local Criminal Rules contemplate that practice. Movant asserts a right to file on this docket under the Crime Victims Relief Act ("CVRA"), 18 U.S.C. § 3771. But they do not establish that they qualify as "victim" under the CVRA's statutory definition. See id. § 3771(e)(2); United States v. Giraldo-Serna, 118 F. Supp. 3d 377, 38283 (D.D.C. 2015). Consequently, the victim's rights enumerated in the CVRA do not attach, see 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a), and the court is not persuaded that it is appropriate to depart from the ordinary course and permit this filing. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/6/2024. (zstd) (Entered: 08/06/2024) Main Document Leave to File Denied

204 Aug 6, 2024 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- Amended Application for CVRA Relief dated 7/7/2024 as to DONALD J. TRUMP. Although courts have in rare instances exercised their discretion to permit third-party submissions in criminal cases, neither the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure nor the Local Criminal Rules contemplate that practice. Movant asserts a right to file on this docket under the Crime Victims Relief Act ("CVRA"), 18 U.S.C. § 3771. But they do not establish that they qualify as "victim" under the CVRA's statutory definition. See id. § 3771(e)(2); United States v. Giraldo-Serna, 118 F. Supp. 3d 377, 38283 (D.D.C. 2015). Consequently, the victim's rights enumerated in the CVRA do not attach, see 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a), and the court is not persuaded that it is appropriate to depart from the ordinary course and permit this filing. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/6/2024. (zstd) (Entered: 08/06/2024) Main Document Leave to File Denied

205 Aug 6, 2024 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- Petition for Writ of Mandamus dated 7/10/2024 as to DONALD J. TRUMP. Although courts have in rare instances exercised their discretion to permit third-party submissions in criminal cases, neither the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure nor the Local Criminal Rules contemplate that practice. Movant asserts a right to file on this docket under the Crime Victims Relief Act ("CVRA"), 18 U.S.C. § 3771. But they do not establish that they qualify as "victim" under the CVRA's statutory definition. See id. § 3771(e)(2); United States v. Giraldo-Serna, 118 F. Supp. 3d 377, 38283 (D.D.C. 2015). Consequently, the victim's rights enumerated in the CVRA do not attach, see 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a), and the court is not persuaded that it is appropriate to depart from the ordinary course and permit this filing. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/6/2024. (zstd) (Entered: 08/06/2024) Main Document Leave to File Denied

206 Aug 6, 2024 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- Motion to Seal Petition dated 7/11/2024 as to DONALD J. TRUMP. Although courts have in rare instances exercised their discretion to permit third-party submissions in criminal cases, neither the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure nor the Local Criminal Rules contemplate that practice. Movant asserts a right to file on this docket under the Crime Victims Relief Act ("CVRA"), 18 U.S.C. § 3771. But they do not establish that they qualify as "victim" under the CVRA's statutory definition. See id. § 3771(e)(2); United States v. Giraldo-Serna, 118 F. Supp. 3d 377, 38283 (D.D.C. 2015). Consequently, the victim's rights enumerated in the CVRA do not attach, see 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a), and the court is not persuaded that it is appropriate to depart from the ordinary course and permit this filing. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/6/2024. (zstd) (Entered: 08/06/2024) Main Document Leave to File Denied

207 Aug 6, 2024LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- Motion to Supplement Petition dated 7/12/2024 as to DONALD J. TRUMP. Although courts have in rare instances exercised their discretion to permit third-party submissions in criminal cases, neither the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure nor the Local Criminal Rules contemplate that practice. Movant asserts a right to file on this docket under the Crime Victims Relief Act ("CVRA"), 18 U.S.C. § 3771. But they do not establish that they qualify as "victim" under the CVRA's statutory definition. See id. § 3771(e)(2); United States v. Giraldo-Serna, 118 F. Supp. 3d 377, 38283 (D.D.C. 2015). Consequently, the victim's rights enumerated in the CVRA do not attach, see 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a), and the court is not persuaded that it is appropriate to depart from the ordinary course and permit this filing. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/6/2024. (zstd) (Entered: 08/06/2024) Main Document Leave to File Denied

208 Aug 6, 2024 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- Motion to Leave to Amend Petition dated 7/19/2024 as to DONALD J. TRUMP. Although courts have in rare instances exercised their discretion to permit third-party submissions in criminal cases, neither the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure nor the Local Criminal Rules contemplate that practice. Movant asserts a right to file on this docket under the Crime Victims Relief Act ("CVRA"), 18 U.S.C. § 3771. But they do not establish that they qualify as "victim" under the CVRA's statutory definition. See id. § 3771(e)(2); United States v. Giraldo-Serna, 118 F. Supp. 3d 377, 38283 (D.D.C. 2015). Consequently, the victim's rights enumerated in the CVRA do not attach, see 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a), and the court is not persuaded that it is appropriate to depart from the ordinary course and permit this filing. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/6/2024. (zstd) (Entered: 08/06/2024) Main Document Leave to File Denied

209 Aug 8, 2024 Joint STATUS REPORT and Government's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time by USA as to DONALD J. TRUMP (Gaston, Molly) (Entered: 08/08/2024) Main Document Status Report

210 Aug 8, 2024 MOTION for Extension of Time by USA as to DONALD J. TRUMP. (See docket entry 209 to view document.) (zstd) (Entered: 08/09/2024) Main Document Motion for Extension of Time to

211 Aug 8, 2024 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- All Writs Application (Michael Hunter) dated 1/17/2024 as to DONALD J. TRUMP. Even if construed as a motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief, the court is not persuaded that filing this submission is warranted. Although courts have in rare instances exercised their discretion to permit third-party submissions in criminal cases, neither the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure nor the Local Criminal Rules contemplate the filing of amicus curiae briefs. At this time, the court does not find it necessary to depart from the ordinary procedural course by permitting this filing. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/8/2024. (zstd) (Entered: 08/09/2024) Main Document Leave to File Denied

212 Aug 8, 2024 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief (Eric Krieg) dated 2/14/2024 as to DONALD J. TRUMP. Although courts have in rare instances exercised their discretion to permit third-party submissions in criminal cases, neither the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure nor the Local Criminal Rules contemplate the filing of amicus curiae briefs. At this time, the court does not find it necessary to depart from the ordinary procedural course by permittingthis filing. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/8/2024. (zstd) (Entered: 08/09/2024) Main Document Leave to File Denied

213 Aug 8, 2024 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- Amicus Curiae Affirmation (Mason W. Hyde) dated 2/26/2024 as to DONALD J. TRUMP. Even if construed as a motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief, the court is not persuaded that filing this submission is warranted. Although courts have in rare instances exercised their discretion to permit third-party submissions in criminal cases, neither the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure nor the Local Criminal Rules contemplate the filing of amicus curiae briefs. At this time, the court does not find it necessary to depart from the ordinary procedural course by permitting this filing. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/8/2024. (zstd) (Entered: 08/09/2024) Main Document Leave to File Denied

214 Aug 8, 2024 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- Petition for Intervention (Jaime Luecano dated 3/15/2024 as to DONALD J. TRUMP. Even if construed as a motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief, the court is not persuaded that filing this submission is warranted. Although courts have in rare instances exercised their discretion to permit third-party submissions in criminal cases, neither the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure nor the Local Criminal Rules contemplate the filing of amicus curiae briefs. At this time, the court does not find it necessary to depart from the ordinary procedural course by permitting this filing. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/8/2024. (zstd) (Entered: 08/09/2024) Main Document Leave to File Denied

215 Aug 8, 2024 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- Pretrial Brief (Basil Marceaux) dated 3/18/2024 as to DONALD J. TRUMP. Even if construed as a motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief, the court is not persuaded that filing this submission is warranted. Although courts have in rare instances exercised their discretion to permit third-party submissions in criminal cases, neither the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure nor the Local Criminal Rules contemplate the filing of amicus curiae briefs. At this time, the court does not find it necessary to depart from the ordinary procedural course by permitting this filing. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/8/2024. (zstd) (Entered: 08/09/2024) Main Document Leave to File Denied

216 Aug 8, 2024 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- Ineffective Counsel Affirmation (Mason W. Hyde) dated 3/19/2024 as to DONALD J. TRUMP. Even if construed as a motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief, the court is not persuaded that filing this submission is warranted. Although courts have in rare instances exercised their discretion to permit third-party submissions in criminal cases, neither the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure nor the Local Criminal Rules contemplate the filing of amicus curiae briefs. At this time, the court does not find it necessary to depart from the ordinary procedural course by permitting this filing. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/8/2024. (zstd) (Entered: 08/09/2024) Main Document Leave to File Denied

217 Aug 8, 2024 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief (Frank E. Pate) dated 4/1/2024 as to DONALD J. TRUMP. Although courts have in rare instances exercised their discretion to permit third-party submissions in criminal cases, neither the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure nor the Local Criminal Rules contemplate the filing of amicus curiae briefs. Atthis time, the court does not find it necessary to depart from the ordinary procedural course by permitting this filing. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/8/2024. (zstd) (Entered: 08/09/2024) Main Document Leave to File Denied

218 Aug 8, 2024 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- Motion to Dismiss Indictment (Frederick Banks) as to DONALD J. TRUMP. Even if construed as a motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief, the court is not persuaded that filing this submission is warranted. Although courts have in rare instances exercised their discretion to permit third-party submissions in criminal cases, neither the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure nor the Local Criminal Rules contemplate the filing of amicus curiae briefs. At this time, the court does not find it necessary to depart from the ordinary procedural course by permitting this filing. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/8/2024. (zstd) (Entered: 08/09/2024) Main Document Leave to File Denied

219 Aug 8, 2024 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- Notice of Statement (Joanne M.) dated 4/29/2024 as to DONALD J. TRUMP. Even if construed as a motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief, the court is not persuaded that filing this submission is warranted. Although courts have in rare instances exercised their discretion to permit third-party submissions in criminal cases, neither the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure nor the Local Criminal Rules contemplate the filing of amicus curiae briefs. At this time, the court does not find it necessary to depart from the ordinary procedural course by permitting this filing. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/8/2024. (zstd) (Entered: 08/09/2024) Main Document Leave to File Denied

220 Aug 8, 2024 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- Motion for Conditional Intervention (John Doe) dated 6/24/2024 as to DONALD J. TRUMP. Even if construed as a motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief, the court is not persuaded that filing this submission is warranted. Although courts have in rare instances exercised their discretion to permit third-party submissions in criminal cases, neither the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure nor the Local Criminal Rules contemplate the filing of amicus curiae briefs. At this time, the court does not find it necessary to depart from the ordinary procedural course by permitting this filing. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/8/2024. (zstd) (Entered: 08/09/2024) Main Document Leave to File Denied

221 Aug 8, 2024 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- Pro Se Amicus Curiae Brief (Joseph L. Westfall) dated 7/2/2024 as to DONALD J. TRUMP. Even if construed as a motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief, the court is not persuaded that filing this submission is warranted. Although courts have in rare instances exercised their discretion to permit third-party submissions in criminal cases, neither the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure nor the Local Criminal Rules contemplate the filing of amicus curiae briefs. At this time, the court does not find it necessary to depart from the ordinary procedural course by permitting this filing. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/8/2024. (zstd) (Entered: 08/09/2024) Main Document Leave to File Denied

222 Aug 8, 2024 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- Motion for Leave to File Letter to Court (Raj K. Patel) dated 8/5/2024 as to DONALD J. TRUMP. Even if construed as a motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief, the court is not persuaded that filing this submission is warranted. Although courts have in rare instances exercised their discretion to permit third-party submissions in criminal cases, neither the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure nor the Local Criminal Rules contemplate that practice. At this time, the court does not find it necessary to depart from the ordinary procedural course by permitting this filing. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/8/2024. (zstd) (Entered: 08/09/2024) Main Document Leave to File Denied

223 Aug 9, 2024 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Se (Raj K. Patel) dated 8/5/2024 as to DONALD J. TRUMP. Even if construed as a motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief, the court is not persuaded that filing this submission is warranted. Although courts have in rare instances exercised their discretion to permit third-party submissions in criminal cases, neitherthe Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure nor the Local Criminal Rules contemplate that practice. At this time, the court does not find it necessary to depart from the ordinary procedural course by permitting this filing. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/9/2024. (zstd) (Entered: 08/09/2024) Main Document Leave to File Denied

Aug 9, 2024 Extension of Time to [this last one - I do not think they finished posting it].



link: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67656604/united-states-v-trump/?page=2
 
More docket updates - but no Docket #s.

Doc # Date Filed Description
Aug 9, 2024 Extension of Time to

Aug 9, 2024 Order on Motion for Extension of Time AND Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings

Aug 9, 2024 MINUTE ORDER as to DONALD J. TRUMP: The Government's 209 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time is hereby GRANTED. The joint status report previously due by August 9, 2024 is now due by August 30, 2024. The status conference previously scheduled for August 16, 2024 is continued until September 5, 2024 at 10:00 A.M. in Courtroom 9. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/9/2024. (zjd)

Aug 9, 2024 MINUTE ORDER as to DONALD J. TRUMP: The Government's 210 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time is hereby GRANTED. The joint status report previously due by August 9, 2024 is now due by August 30, 2024. The status conference previously scheduled for August 16, 2024 is continued until September 5, 2024 at 10:00 A.M. in Courtroom 9. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/9/2024. (zjd)

link: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67656604/united-states-v-trump/?page=2
 
Docket updates:

Dkt # Date Filed Description
224 Aug 14, 2024 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- Motion to Reconsider (Raj K. Patel) dated 8/9/2024 as to DONALD J. TRUMP. Although courts have in rare instances exercised their discretion to permit third-party submissions in criminal cases, neither the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure nor the Local Criminal Rules contemplate that practice. At this time, the court does not find it necessary to depart from the ordinary procedural course by permitting this filing. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/14/2024. (zstd) (Entered: 08/14/2024) Main Document
Leave to File Denied

225 Aug 15, 2024 REDACTED OPINION and ORDER as to DONALD J. TRUMP: Granting in part and denying in part the Government's Motion to Strike Defendant's CIPA Section 5 Notice. See ECF Nos. 121 , 149 . This Opinion and Order is classified and under seal. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/15/2024. (zjd) Main Document Memorandum Opinion


link: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67656604/united-states-v-trump/?page=2
 
Updated 8/22/24

DC – 2020 Election. Trump has been charged with 4 criminal counts:
• Conspiracy to defraud the United States
• Conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding
• Obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding
• Conspiracy against rights
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan presiding. Prosecution: Thomas Windom, Molly Gulland Gaston, J.P. Cooney & James Pearce all lead attorneys. Defense attorneys: John F. Lauro, lead attorney, Emil Bove, Fitzah I. Pavalon, Pro Hac Vice, Todd Blanche, Pro Hac Vice & Attorney Will Scharf. U.S. District Court, District of Columbia (Washington, DC) Case #23-cr-00257-TSC-1
Trial was put on HOLD – pending decision of U.S. Supreme Court on 4/25/24 on Trump’s presidential immunity appeal.
Monday, 7/1/24 Update: Decision: "The indictment’s allegations that Trump attempted to pressure the Vice President to take particular acts in connection with his role at the certification proceeding thus involve official conduct & Trump is at least presumptively immune from prosecution for such conduct." "The indictment’s remaining allegations involve Trump’s interactions with persons outside the Executive Branch: state officials, private parties & the general public." These issues must be remanded to the District Court for further inspection. The U.S. Supreme Court sends Trump's immunity case back to a lower court in Washington.
Friday, 8/16/24 Update: Status conference hearing at 10am. Hearing was rescheduled on 9/5/24.
Wednesday, 9/5/24 @ 10am – Status conference hearing.
 
Last edited:
@kyledcheney


NEWS: Trump is indicted anew in Washington, D.C. for his effort to subvert the 2020 election, an attempt by Jack Smith to comport his earlier case with the Supreme Court's immunity decision — and reignite his long-stalled case. w/ @joshgerstein


https://twitter.com/x/status/1828527825596379502
 
sds71 said:
@kyledcheney


NEWS: Trump is indicted anew in Washington, D.C. for his effort to subvert the 2020 election, an attempt by Jack Smith to comport his earlier case with the Supreme Court's immunity decision — and reignite his long-stalled case. w/ @joshgerstein


https://twitter.com/x/status/1828527825596379502
Click to expand...
I do love Jack's dogged determination.
 
sds71 said:
@kyledcheney


NEWS: Trump is indicted anew in Washington, D.C. for his effort to subvert the 2020 election, an attempt by Jack Smith to comport his earlier case with the Supreme Court's immunity decision — and reignite his long-stalled case. w/ @joshgerstein


https://twitter.com/x/status/1828527825596379502
Click to expand...

Statement released by Jack Smith's lawyers ....

"Today, a federal grand jury in the District of Columbia returned a superseding indictment, charging the defendant with the same criminal offenses that were charged in the original indictment”

“The superseding indictment, which was presented to a new grand jury that had not previously heard evidence in this case, reflects the Government’s efforts to respect and implement the Supreme Court’s holdings and remand instructions in Trump v United States.”

www.theguardian.com

Special counsel files new indictment against Trump over 2020 election

Move does not substantially change criminal case but protects it in wake of July supreme court immunity ruling
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
 
SouthAussie said:
Statement released by Jack Smith's lawyers ....

"Today, a federal grand jury in the District of Columbia returned a superseding indictment, charging the defendant with the same criminal offenses that were charged in the original indictment”

“The superseding indictment, which was presented to a new grand jury that had not previously heard evidence in this case, reflects the Government’s efforts to respect and implement the Supreme Court’s holdings and remand instructions in Trump v United States.”

www.theguardian.com

Special counsel files new indictment against Trump over 2020 election

Move does not substantially change criminal case but protects it in wake of July supreme court immunity ruling
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
Click to expand...
Just repeating this quote for emphasis as the story will be told that Jack Smith is "after" Trump or the Biden administration is out to get him, and it will be lost in that whining that:

"a federal grand jury in the District of Columbia returned a superseding indictment."

jmo
 
Inthedetails said:
Just repeating this quote for emphasis as the story will be told that Jack Smith is "after" Trump or the Biden administration is out to get him, and it will be lost in that whining that:

"a federal grand jury in the District of Columbia returned a superseding indictment."

jmo
Click to expand...

Yes. And not the first federal grand jury to do so. But a second federal grand jury who had not heard any of the evidence before.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Members online

... and 167 more.
Total: 481 (members: 168, guests: 313)

Online statistics

Members online
168
Guests online
313
Total visitors
481
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
609,440
Messages
18,254,199
Members
234,653
Latest member
Cheyenne233
Back
Top