DC - Former President Donald Trump indicted, 4 federal counts in 2020 election interference, 1 Aug 2023, Trial 4 Mar 2024 #2
- Thread starter sds71
- Start date
Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread
SouthAussie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Messages
- 30,408
- Reaction score
- 187,342
"Experts speaking to Newsweek have debunked Donald Trump's claim that the release of a new briefing by special prosecutor Jack Smith, outlining the case to prosecute the former president, was a "hit job," saying Trump knew about it and had caused the delays leading to its release.
"Yet again, he [Trump] is not correct," Weinstein said.
"As can see from the docket, the Judge set these dates back at the beginning of September."
"Judge Chutkan's decision to unseal, and the timing of the decision to unseal, were hers alone—nothing to do with Jack Smith—and she made that choice with every opportunity for Mr. Trump's lawyers to object and be heard if anything seemed potentially improper, unseemly, or political."
"This is the opposite of a 'hit job.'" Green said.
"It is a fully proper legal effort to comply with the Supreme Court's ruling from this summer."
www.newsweek.com
"Yet again, he [Trump] is not correct," Weinstein said.
"As can see from the docket, the Judge set these dates back at the beginning of September."
"Judge Chutkan's decision to unseal, and the timing of the decision to unseal, were hers alone—nothing to do with Jack Smith—and she made that choice with every opportunity for Mr. Trump's lawyers to object and be heard if anything seemed potentially improper, unseemly, or political."
"This is the opposite of a 'hit job.'" Green said.
"It is a fully proper legal effort to comply with the Supreme Court's ruling from this summer."
Trump says Jack Smith briefing a timed "hit job"—here are the facts
Experts tell Newsweek that Donald Trump's accusation of "hit job" filing was arguably his own fault.
www.newsweek.com
SouthAussie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Messages
- 30,408
- Reaction score
- 187,342
"Former President Donald Trump will not have to respond to special counsel Jack Smith’s massive recent filing in the ongoing election interference case against him until after the election, a judge ruled on Thursday."
www.salon.com
Trump won't have to respond to Smith filing until after election
Judge Tanya Chutkan gave Trump until November 7 to respond to Jack Smith's bombshell Jan 6 filing in court
www.salon.com
Niner
Long time Websleuther
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2003
- Messages
- 87,647
- Reaction score
- 295,739
Docket updates:
Doc # Date Filed Description
254 Oct 2, 2024 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 252 MOTION for Immunity Determinations and MOTION for Leave to File. (See docket entry 253 to view document.)by DONALD J. TRUMP. (zstd) (Entered: 10/03/2024) Main Document
255 Oct 3, 2024 SUPPLEMENT by DONALD J. TRUMP re 114 MOTION to Dismiss Case Based on Statutory Grounds (Bove, Emil) (Entered: 10/03/2024) Main Document Supplement to any document
Oct 3, 2024 Extension of Time to File Response/Reply AND Leave to File Document
Oct 3, 2024 MINUTE ORDER as to DONALD J. TRUMP: Defendant's 253 "Motion to Extend Page Limits and Time to Respond to Government's Motion for Immunity Determinations and for Leave to File a Sur-Reply" is hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The court's 233 Order is MODIFIED as follows: Defendant's combined Response and Renewed Motion to Dismiss Based on Presidential Immunity is due November 7, 2024 and may include up to 180 pages; the Government's combined Reply and Opposition is due November 21, 2024; and Defendant may file a combined Reply and Sur-Reply by December 5, 2024. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 10/3/2024. (zcll)
Oct 3, 2024 Order AND ~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines AND ~Util - Terminate Motions
link: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67656604/united-states-v-trump/?page=2
Doc # Date Filed Description
254 Oct 2, 2024 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 252 MOTION for Immunity Determinations and MOTION for Leave to File. (See docket entry 253 to view document.)by DONALD J. TRUMP. (zstd) (Entered: 10/03/2024) Main Document
255 Oct 3, 2024 SUPPLEMENT by DONALD J. TRUMP re 114 MOTION to Dismiss Case Based on Statutory Grounds (Bove, Emil) (Entered: 10/03/2024) Main Document Supplement to any document
Oct 3, 2024 Extension of Time to File Response/Reply AND Leave to File Document
Oct 3, 2024 MINUTE ORDER as to DONALD J. TRUMP: Defendant's 253 "Motion to Extend Page Limits and Time to Respond to Government's Motion for Immunity Determinations and for Leave to File a Sur-Reply" is hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The court's 233 Order is MODIFIED as follows: Defendant's combined Response and Renewed Motion to Dismiss Based on Presidential Immunity is due November 7, 2024 and may include up to 180 pages; the Government's combined Reply and Opposition is due November 21, 2024; and Defendant may file a combined Reply and Sur-Reply by December 5, 2024. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 10/3/2024. (zcll)
Oct 3, 2024 Order AND ~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines AND ~Util - Terminate Motions
link: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67656604/united-states-v-trump/?page=2
All those judges are doing is helping cover up crimes committed in a blatant attempt to overthrow the same government those judges took an oath to protect. It’s disturbing how many members of our judiciary have become corrupt. JMO"Former President Donald Trump will not have to respond to special counsel Jack Smith’s massive recent filing in the ongoing election interference case against him until after the election, a judge ruled on Thursday."
Trump won't have to respond to Smith filing until after election
Judge Tanya Chutkan gave Trump until November 7 to respond to Jack Smith's bombshell Jan 6 filing in court
JMO he will lose and he will go to jail. Justice will prevail.
I would love to think so, but I am very afraid it won't.