observation
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2014
- Messages
- 1,388
- Reaction score
- 34
Now we wait until December 17.... Oh, man.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The daughters look very attractive and I'm so glad that neither were home at the time. Because I have a feeling that Wint would have turned this into a sexual torture as well. Jmo
Wow. I remember back at eight weeks when we were speculating that DDW acted alone because no one else had been arrested. Now it has been months and still no more arrests, yet the pros still thinks there were accomplices? I wonder what is taking so long to arrest, or if this is some kind of strategy?
Why don't they just pull his darn hair in a pony tail and show him to the witness? We know he does wear his hair in a pony tail, he even did so in court. If witness saw him with a pony tail, it could be mistaken for a short hair. To me it just seems so obvious.Friday morning, Wint's defense attorney said he wants to know the name of the witness who identified the person in the stolen Porsche. That witness described the person as having short hair, which doesn't match Wint's description.
Wint is scheduled to return on Dec. 17 at 9:30 a.m.
http://www.wusa9.com/story/news/loc...ect-dc-mansion-murders-court-friday/72784062/
I think it's probably based on not just one thing but the preponderance of the evidence. Couple this with how other criminals have done similar crimes. You might want to do some research ( ponder) on how a military unit would enter and secure/ interrogate a house filled with several people. The police have a very good reason to suspect he had accomplices.Wow. I remember back at eight weeks when we were speculating that DDW acted alone because no one else had been arrested. Now it has been months and still no more arrests, yet the pros still thinks there were accomplices? I wonder what is taking so long to arrest, or if this is some kind of strategy?
I think it's probably based on not just one thing but the preponderance of the evidence. Couple this with how other criminals have done similar crimes. You might want to do some research ( ponder) on how a military unit would enter and secure/ interrogate a house filled with several people. The police have a very good reason to suspect he had accomplices.
I am sure they are aware of these cases don't you??.
The police also have numerous instances where a single home invader destroys several people. Recently in Houston a lone man entered a home, subdued and murdered eight people.
I am sure they are aware of these cases don't you??
The police think more people are involved and so do I.
They have their reasons. You have yours...
Does anyone know if it's difficult to drive a Porsche if you've never driven one before? I wonder if DW was familiar with handling a Porsche?
Does anyone know if it's difficult to drive a Porsche if you've never driven one before? I wonder if DW was familiar with handling a Porsche?
How lucky, I lusted after a 911 when I was 15 and 16. I grew up near a very wealthy area ( polo club) and my friends an I would always see girls driving their porshe it never occurred to us that it could have been their fathers.Oh my gosh, I just remembered that my best friend and I used to drive her dad's Porsche before we had our drivers licenses--apparently not that hard or we just got lucky!
I think it's probably based on not just one thing but the preponderance of the evidence. Couple this with how other criminals have done similar crimes. You might want to do some research ( ponder) on how a military unit would enter and secure/ interrogate a house filled with several people. The police have a very good reason to suspect he had accomplices.
How lucky, I lusted after a 911 when I was 15 and 16. I grew up near a very wealthy area ( polo club) and my friends an I would always see girls driving their porshe it never occurred to us that it could have been their fathers.
I am sure they are aware of these cases don't you??
The police think more people are involved and so do I.
They have their reasons. You have yours...
I believe you're probably right, Keefer. They have the benefit of the doubt by me! I don't think any of us know more about the case (or more about LE in general) than those involved in this case do. If they say they think others were involved, I believe them. Unfortunately, believing something and having evidence to prosecute are two different things. We are not privy to what LE and the prosecution know and have. Just because they don't have enough evidence to press charges against someone doesn't mean that they have no idea of who else might have been involved. Look at the Teresa Sievers case.
I didn't say they could prove anything. I just said they believe strongly that others were involved. They are basing this on their investigation and not what goes on in forums such as this. If you know more about it than the police investigating the crime, please let us know all about your theory.
They can believe in something, but it doesn't appear they got anything to back that belief up. Video shows a single guy running away from the burning car. Witness saw one guy driving a car. I don't think they got anybody's DNA or fingerprints except DW's (or they would have arrested somebody else already).