Debbie Bradley and Jeremy Irwin on Dr. Phil 3 February 2012

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
VP: Why now?
JS: Family wants to reinvigorate the story.
 
KC police say leads have diminished. Local media want to bring Lisa home. JS doesn't know why DB and JI chose to do Dr. Phil instead of getting word out locally.
 
Why did they not take on JS with his invitation to come on HLN but instead go on Dr. Phil?

JS is wondering why they don't talk to him to get Lisa's story out there.
 
Did JimS. just say that Deb and Jeremy flew to New York for the Dr. Phil interview?
 
Fantastic Vinnie is hammering it home that neither the family or their lawyer or PI is going out and talking to witnesses.

Hope it forces them to reveal who has been doing that type of work for them.
 
Dang it, my cable company always cuts off Vinnie for local newsmakers. Anything else at the end? TIA
 
I don't think so, I thought he said he told them to come to HLN and him to get the word out about BL missing, etc.

:waitasec:

They'd be crazy to go on HLN. I'm not watching it and just reading the updates being posted.

Mike Brooks who I adore, btw, is questioning why Dr. Phil but yet he's convinced the parents are involved.

Same with Vinnie and JS.

Who in their right mind would appear on HLN? And these guys are the "soft" guys. Imagine what JVM and NG would do to the parents? :eek:
 
They'd be crazy to go on HLN. I'm not watching it and just reading the updates being posted.

Mike Brooks who I adore, btw, is questioning why Dr. Phil but yet he's convinced the parents are involved.

Same with Vinnie and JS.

Who in their right mind would appear on HLN? And these guys are the "soft" guys. Imagine what JVM and NG would do to the parents? :eek:

If one had nothing to hide and were really interested in finding their child why would one care who interviewed them?
 
They'd be crazy to go on HLN. I'm not watching it and just reading the updates being posted.

Mike Brooks who I adore, btw, is questioning why Dr. Phil but yet he's convinced the parents are involved.

Same with Vinnie and JS.

Who in their right mind would appear on HLN? And these guys are the "soft" guys. Imagine what JVM and NG would do to the parents? :eek:

But good ole Doc. Phil is even softer. That is why this interview will do nothing more than get Lisa's picture out there and whatever red herrings Joe T. can get on camera.

Don't get me wrong. I agree that she needs to be on the news to generate interest again and maybe jog a few memories. I just don't think Dr. Phil is the right venue.
 
If one had nothing to hide and were really interested in finding their child why would one care who interviewed them?

They were interviewed over and over and people who think they're involved will continue to regardless of what they say so what's the point. Going on NG to be ridiculed and have words twisted won't help find Lisa.

Stay away from HLN...they've already showed their biased opinion. We need someone who is fair and unbiased. I think Dr. Phil will do a great job.
 
They were interviewed over and over and people who think they're involved will continue to regardless of what they say so what's the point. Going on NG to be ridiculed and have words twisted won't help find Lisa.

Stay away from HLN...they've already showed their biased opinion. We need someone who is fair and unbiased. I think Dr. Phil will do a great job.

Sigh, I suppose if you want a soft pillow for the parents to lay on, Dr. Phil will do.
 
Sigh, I suppose if you want a soft pillow for the parents to lay on, Dr. Phil will do.

As far as I know, they're not suspects nor does LE have any evidence to prove either one murdered this beautiful baby. So until there is proof that one or both are involved, they don't need the constant badgering and interrogations by people with an agenda. They already got it from LE and it obviously got nowhere. Lisa is still missing.
 
No he's a reporter and seems to have all the scoop on this case or so he thinks, imo

I have followed a lot of cases in the news and Jim Spellman has been a very fair and diligent reporter in this case.

His walks around the property showing the viewers the trails people walked have been outstanding when it comes to us trying to put the pieces together. He has interviewed more people then any other reporter in this case and has treated all with respect.

He has not jumped to any conclusions and has backed up all he reports with facts.

I usually do not comment on reporters in a positive way but after watching Spellman I get the feeling he really would like to figure out the case or give us enough information to come to some reasonable conclusions.

He has not been anti the Irwin family in the least little bit.
 
Fantastic Vinnie is hammering it home that neither the family or their lawyer or PI is going out and talking to witnesses.

Hope it forces them to reveal who has been doing that type of work for them.

How does Vinnie know this? Has he been following them around? Good grief. I love Vinnie but when they form opinions based on hearsay, it makes me crazy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
73
Guests online
187
Total visitors
260

Forum statistics

Threads
609,329
Messages
18,252,706
Members
234,625
Latest member
XtraGuacPlz
Back
Top