davehead21
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2008
- Messages
- 2,076
- Reaction score
- 197
Does anyone know how old DB is?
I believe she's 25.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Does anyone know how old DB is?
I must be missing something. Why was this photo posted on this thread? :waitasec:
oh_gal, here's what I was able to find on this issue:
"Lawyers. Military personnel and family members all have access to free legal services provided by the "legal office" (JAG). What most people don't realize, however, is the JAG is of very little help when it comes to divorce and separation. At most, the JAG can give you general advice. They cannot prepare divorce or separation documents, they cannot represent you in court, they cannot file legal divorce or separation paperwork for you. Quite often, even the "general advice" may be of little use, as there is no requirement that a military lawyer be licensed to practice law in the state they are stationed in, so the lawyer's knowledge of divorce laws of that particular state may be limited."
http://usmilitary.about.com/od/divbenefits/a/idcardshousing.htm
It's been 2 years. If there was a property settlement, or alimony/child support to sort out, I would hope DB would have taken care of it by now. If there's money to be had, custody issues to determine, I personally wouldn't wait 2 years or longer to bring it to resolution. Good night - the husband could just swing in and take the child since they are both in fact still married to each other.
In the back of my mind I think it may just be a paperwork thing that neither one of them can't be bothered to sort out.
I could be wrong, but that's how I'm taking it. Just my opinion, in my opinion only, etc., etc., etc.
Mel
I believe she's 25.
I also have to wonder, has Sean Bradley done something that makes him fair game for citicism? He's not a person of interest in this case, that I'm aware of.
I must be missing something. Why was this photo posted on this thread? :waitasec:
I think it is from the video that is linked in the OP.
I also have to wonder, has Sean Bradley done something that makes him fair game for citicism? He's not a person of interest in this case, that I'm aware of.
oh pfffftttt...they can't afford a divorce. I divorced my ex and we did it all by ourselves with about 300 bucks. You're telling me that in 2 years the two of them couldn't scrape together enough funds for paperwork and a filing fee?
And he hasn't spoken to DB or his son (for goodness sake) for 2 years. How does he know she's a good mom? I wonder if he's even paying to support his son? It would be a good reason to give her a glowing review if he isn't.
I'm calling bull=chit.
MOO
Mel
I dunno to me this thread has gotten out of hand. Are people so desperate to find fault with DB that they are willing to pick apart any non negative statement made by friends/family? Now there is some devious reason why they never divorced?
I have a sneaking feeling she "tricked" him into marrying her one way or another.
Seriously?? Dear God, what a huge leap. :banghead:
ok thanks but I'm still not getting the point. Are we supposed to notice something? She looks happy and holding a child. :dunno:
While I am not sleuthing SB here (honey currently in Afghanistan as I type) I do have one question pertaining to this marriage.
Since DB and SB are still legally married, under the law, can Lisa be the legal child of SB?
The legal father is the man who is married to the birth mother even if she has been separated from him and even if he is not the biological father.
Yes. Seriously.
The last time I checked, neither are the parents... just sayin'... MOO
Of course they are persons on interest in this case. They are the parents of the missing child and the owners of the home from which she went missing.
Sean Bradley, on the other hand, is a peripheral person who has nothing what-so-ever to do with the disappearance of this child, and therefore, imho, not fair game for trashing.
We're barely even allowed to discuss DB's brother, but somehow SB is just up for grabs?!
I have a problem with that.
MOO, JMO, IMO, and so on and so forth.