So JB finds the "brief" comments between JS and MD (in court and witnessed) to be inappropriate to the point of suggesting JS be removed?
Well.....I'd like JB to dazzle me with his ethical opinions by commenting on the appropriateness of: accepting $70K from TM which was funnelled into KC's defense account, arguing against a gag order, assigning lovey dovey nicknames to KC's mom in emails, frittering away $275K of defense money, allegedly brokering deals for photo sales, wow......I could go on but I'd be up all night.
I'm wondering what the process for removing Baez would be and if maybe he has been sensing that JS might make a move in that direction and simply decided to make a pre-emptive move?