I tried meditation twice, didn't work too well with my ADD :happydance:. In all seriousness, being still legally attached to someone who pleaded guilty to murder could be a hinderance in custody or visitation of her late daughters children. And with the media being so far reaching in this day and age, I don't think most people would want to be known across the country as the person who stood by a man who butchered (sorry if that is harsh, but that is what he did) an innocent mother and a healer to so many in her community. And, if they are divorced, there is no right to claim spousal privilege if there is a need to testify. IMO, by not divorcing now could be a way of protecting him. There are so many side story tragedies attached to this case, SMH.
On a side note, how do you snip a convo on here for focus?
BBM
I'm a bit torn on this, as I do have some empathy for AW, but she has already put CWW before her son / grandkids.
I think there is also another snippet in the interviews about AW being uncomfortable around her GD because of her disability, but I can't find it ATM.
I'm just not sure she's that bothered.
____________________
MD: Okay. Have you -- can you give me a specific example of anything that he's done ln the past that you
know of, or anything that would make you feel uneasy about him?
EM: There was a problem with Angie's other son and --
MD: Okay.
EM: -- and Wayne. And the boy was taken from her and put into State custody because
MD: Okay.
EM:
MD: And took him out?
EM: Yes.
MD: Okay.
EM: Which is one reason she cannot have the great grandchildren, and we have our guardianship of the great
grandchildren.
MD: I understand. Oh, so you actually raised the -- your great grandchildren, they live with you?
EM: My-- the great grandson, the boy right there, lives with us, and, uh, the little girl does also-
[From the sworn statement of EM #5233 & #5234 https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B717FUtKwdU8bjduM3RsYzNCak0/view ]