joypath
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 24, 2007
- Messages
- 1,667
- Reaction score
- 858
I think in some cases, the entire specimen used for a particular test is used up, for instance in a root sample the test would certainly use that up. But there were bones of Caylee's which were allotted to the testing process and I doubt these were consumed in testing. ANY testing that is necessary should in theory reach similar results no matter which bone is used, so I would think that the bone sections that were set aside for testing, which were NOT returned to the Anthonys as a part of Caylee's remains may still be out there and accessible for such a purpose, should the defense wish to pursue that.
Standard protocol requires that "split sampling" be made available to the defense,WHENEVER POSSIBLE, that is exactly what it sounds like, the crime lab takes some "stuff" and then saves the rest UNPROCESSED if and when the defense wants to evaluate it. If an entire unknown is consumed, then the defense should request all records of the testing protocol....including the "infamous LKB bench notes". Sometimes if the alleged perp is in custody and under counsel, the court will sanction/mandate the defense expert's attendance as the testing protocol is performed (RARE!). And as an FYI, there have been times where forensic pathologists hired as expert witnesses by a defendant have witnessed the primary autopsy (in most jurisdictions it's the ME's call to extend the welcome)