True. That said, would you have expected a visit this week on the heels of the discovery release?
If nothing else, but to discuss details from Michelle & Annie's statements that KC felt unstable previously?
Or, what would a defense attorney wish to discuss with a client now based on this latest discovery release? The laundry bag? The sticker?
For starters, I wouldn't be publically issuing any statements the way the JB camp does when there's a doc dump. If and ONLY if I were being confronted by the media, I'd politely and firmly be saying what I always say: "We have no comment at this time. Thank you."
What would I want to discuss with my client? We'd go over every piece of paper that the state gives us, one by one and, eventually, we'd get through it all. It's all got to be discussed.
But it would be done on my terms in connection with my working up my client's defense case - NOT for purposes of making some responsive (read: defensive) presser to the media as JB makes. If I were JB, I wouldn't be worrying about the document dump in terms of the media. Course, I'd have been the one filing the Motion For Gag Order and certainly would not have opposed one filed by the state. :doh:
I'd just be merging this material right into the rest of the work one must do, diseminating the relevant portion(s) to the various expert(s) who need said portions, and combing through it with my client over the next year or so. (Yes, it will take that long for this to go to trial, so there's no real rush here to get through it with Casey.)