I will NOT believe the Daily Mail "facts" unless it's reported by a more respectable news agency. For days, DM was reporting the 6 year old victim's mother was despondent when told her daughter had passed. It was just reported yesterday (?) that she was finally told. After a couple of days DM updated their story to the correct version.
JH mother did not say "you have your man." According to her atty's statement yesterday, she ONLY confirmed he was her son. Everything else was taken out of context and/or completely misrepresented for sensationalism. Since they wouldn't even talk about their son at all during the press conference yesterday, I doubt she is telling DM (or their sources) she was convinced for years he would do this. And that article even has the audacity to say since she was a nurse she is feeling guilty because she could have averted this tragedy. Really?