Sure... I think this could have went ether way here. Ether Darlie went bananas, and flew into a fit of rage or there was an intruder.
I don't think anyone has proven that there was no intruder, and from what I read, the crime scene was bumbled and compromised by dozens of LE, and ER trampling around that night along with neighbors and so-on; there was just no way to do a proper investigation.
It's true that anyone wandering around that house that night could have ran water in the sink, or knocked the vacuum on the floor; we just can't ever know at this point.
I know a lot of us on the forum would agree when saying there is a good probability of an intruder at Darlie's home the night the murders took place.
That's why I brought up Adam Lane.
As another poster could put it: it's highly unlikely that anyone could have inflicted such serous injuries upon their own-self. Not to mention the bruises and defensive wounds.
I did see a show on youtube. I don't have a link right now, but I can look it up for you guys later.
Anyhow, on the show: two highly professional investigators took a look at the Darlie case. They even interviewed her in prison. Their conclusions were: the case was improperly investigated, and bumbled from the get go. I think they also interviewed the guy who testified about the blood spatter/back spatter, and concluded he was filled with malarkey.
Nevertheless, I know we can't say at this point if there was an intruder or not. I do believe many feel the case should be re-examined.
I don't think anyone has proven that there was no intruder, and from what I read, the crime scene was bumbled and compromised by dozens of LE, and ER trampling around that night along with neighbors and so-on; there was just no way to do a proper investigation.
That is absolutely not true, that is nothing but supporter rhetoric. In fact the crime scene was controlled, even the Chief of Police was not allowed in, there were not dozens of rescue workers running up and down the house. Nor were neighbours allowed in. One neighbour was escorted, by police, up the front stairs, no where near the scene of the murders, to get the dog, that's it.
It's true that anyone wandering around that house that night could have ran water in the sink, or knocked the vacuum on the floor; we just can't ever know at this point.
No one wandering around the house ran water that night and yes we do know at this point because we have their trial testimony and the photos of the crime scene.
I know a lot of us on the forum would agree when saying there is a good probability of an intruder at Darlie's home the night the murders took place.
Almost 20 years after the murders and we have yet to discover any evidence whatsoever an intruder was in Darlie's home that night killing her boys. All the blood evidence points to her and no one else.
You need to read the trial transcripts. It's the only true record of what happened.
Anyhow, on the show: two highly professional investigators took a look at the Darlie case. They even interviewed her in prison. Their conclusions were: the case was improperly investigated, and bumbled from the get go. I think they also interviewed the guy who testified about the blood spatter/back spatter, and concluded he was filled with malarkey.
LOL, those two retired detectives were a hoot. I can't believe they would make such blunders against their fellow officers. That was just a tv show, nothing occurred because of it. Neither one of them is or was an experience crime scene investigator nor is either one of them an experienced, veteran blood spatter expert like Bevel is so who cares if they think his theory was malarkey, the jury didn't.
This case has been reexamined on appeal, there was no intruder, just Darlie. There is absolutely no legal reason for a new trial whatsoever. For 20 years now, Darlie has claimed that the bloody print on the glass table belongs to the male intruder in her home that night. The new Y-STR DNA tests refute that claim, there was no Y, or male gene, detected. She has no where else left to go except to her execution.
This crime does not fit Adam Lane's MO, he never murdered two sleeping children and he's been caught by evidence he committed the crimes he was charged with.