They knew the manner of death was homicide. They didn't listen to anything the SA said. They simply are liberals (bleeding hearts) who don't believe in the DP.
They knew the manner of death was homicide.
Even I, who has followed this case since day 1, as the saying goes, am not convinced this was a homicide. There are many alternative scenarios which come quickly to mind given there was a pool at the home, GA has a temper as exhibited on national TV and the witness stand, plus the total dysfunction taking place in that home, especially the rumored fight the night of the 15th.
They didn't listen to anything the SA said.
I listened to every word the SA said, listened to the experts, and still I was not convinced. What did sway me, at the very end of the SAs closing argument was LDBs pictures of Casey in her blue dress and the tatoo. For a moment there I was screaming murder in the first degree - until I realized my feelings were based on emotion, not evidence. I hate it when that happens - reminds me of the Oxbow Incident.
I am intelligent enough to know circumstantial evidence can make a good, prosecutable case. However, in my opinion, even the circumstantial evidence was suspect, and none of it tied to Casey directly, or alone. In fact, the odor in the car made me more suspicious of GA than Casey. GA said he smelled the smell, knew the smell, left the car at home without calling LE, then went to work - so did Cindy - on the trunk. GA even had his own key to that car, so for me, that let Casey off the hook as being the only person with access to the car.
So, what did I really have? I had a bunch of liars flapping their gums on the witness stand, so many, it was hard to glean any fact from all the fictions. I had a lot of new science that didnt prove anything to me conclusively - which JB managed to poke holes through during his closing argument. I had a tale, woven by the prosecution, of an evil young woman who possibly used chloroform (not proven) before killing her child by wrapping an odd brand of duct tape around her head 3 times to suffocate her. To me, that wasnt proven either; I think it highly possible the tape was used to bind the top of the bag, and caught on Caylees hair when her skull came out of the bag. Remember, that bag, body, and skull were subjected to flood, animals, and Kronk. No way was it proven, to me, Casey wrapped that tape around Caylees head to kill her.
Plus, there is one other glaring omission to everyones argument, both SA, and DT - where was Caylees body prior to being placed in the car trunk, IF it ever was in there? GA saw no body on the 24th, TL saw or smelled nothing, even the experts for SA noted there were no early colonizer flies in that trunk. Where was the body and why?
There were so many loose ends in this case the blanket of guilt unraveled very quickly - to me anyway.
They simply are liberals (bleeding hearts) who don't believe in the DP.
I am not a bleeding heart liberal. I am a tough old lady whos seen a lot of killers come and go Id have no problem putting a murderer to death, young, old, male, or female, but I wouldnt put a fly to death on the shaky circumstantial evidence the SA presented to the jury.
If I had been a juror, I would have voted NOT GUILTY, the same as this jury did. It was the right verdict given the evidence presented. No, the jury did not get it wrong.
My opinion only
