Leila
Active Member
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2005
- Messages
- 12,378
- Reaction score
- 28
One of his attorneys, Joel Brodsky, questioned whether state police were trying to influence public opinion just before the trial by launching the downstate search for Stacy. He mocked the search effort, saying, "Two possum families finally have closure."
http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/bolingbrooksun/news/2397126,4_1_JO16_PETERSON_S1-100616.article
On Saturday, Brodsky released a statement that read in part, "There has never been one, single factual piece of evidence regarding either Stacy's disappearance, or in the death of Kathy Savio, that shows that Drew is guilty of any wrongdoing whatsoever."
He also called the most recent search "patently ridiculous."
"Drew's position from day one has always been that she ran off with another man because that's what she told him," Brodsky said.
http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&id=7482823
Brodsky, who has taken potshots at the state police since they launched the Peoria search operation, did so again this week.
"The state police finally have it right," he said. "Stacy is playing possum."
http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/heraldnews/news/2421376,4_1_JO23_PETERSON_S1-100623.article
So, given JB's stance on the search, why does he want this?
"We want to know why they're digging in Peoria," said Joel Brodsky, the lead attorney for Stacy's husband -- disgraced former cop Drew Peterson.
"We're curious," Brodsky said. "For a lot of reasons, we're curious."
http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/heraldnews/news/2421376,4_1_JO23_PETERSON_S1-100623.article
LOL! ......now you're curious?
Idiot.
Crocus...............I wish some reporter would throw Joel Brodsky's comments back at him and then ask the question, "after all your comments denouncing the search and ridiculing police efforts, what made you suddenly do a turnabout and become concerned about that search and start demanding answers?"