Colin de France
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2014
- Messages
- 1,094
- Reaction score
- 0
I can imagine her screaming and waving the jeans at the same time to attract attention but you could well be right.
It wasn't pushed in court because nothing can be proved about how the jeans came to be there.
Do we even know for a fact that they were RS's? I know her mom seems to imply they were, but then apparently so was the bag that OP's sis stole from the crime scene... dang, now I'm really wondering what all may have left the scene in that.
If it's true that he and JE may have had plans for that evening, perhaps she had popped by to drop off her overnight bag before she went off to do whatever until OP was free while RS while was out doing her shopping etc in the early afternoon, before she told OP she was going to stick around until 6pm. When she got home she could have found JE's stuff(jeans etc) and waited to hash it out with OP in person(instead of over the phone when he'd called from their friend's, thus his decision not to go out with the boys after all) and not to make dinner for him but to tell him they were over ... then the chase would have been back on for OP to get her to stay and be a good girl like all his ex's, or shut her up.
One gaping hole Defense fell through was OPs (alleged) deafness after the shots* vs Reevas screams.
Roux declared that Reeva never screamed, that his client screams like a woman, yet produced zero evidence of same.
OP declared she never screamed but then admitted he couldnt hear! What kind of stupid rebuttal evidence is that? It doesnt even rise to the level of ridiculous.
Four ear witnesses had NO hearing problems when they heard Reeva scream for her life, yet Masipa trashed them in favor of the (allegedly) deaf accused. This is judicial illogic (in bed with cherry-picking bias) at its very finest.
Its like asking a blind man to minutely describe the scenery, costumes and lighting in a stage play.
OP was stone-cold silent for 31 seconds (except for crybaby wailing) after Nel asked him if Reeva screamed after the first shot. That silence was wholly damning (giant red flag) - if for no other reason than OP himself introduced serious doubt into his version of Reevas 100% silence.
* How temporarily deaf does one actually become after shooting a gun?
For me, this was the most dramatic part of the entire trial. I'll never forget those 31 seconds. It was an eternity. I'm sure every single person watching around the world held their collective breaths. I can't help wondering if he was re-living that dreadful moment for the first time and his mind was in another place as he remembered her agonised screams.
Very true this has been discussed at length some time ago
- OP stated that he proceeded to the bathroom to protect Reeva ergo, in his mind, being in bedroom whilst intruders were in the bathroom was more dangerous than proceeding to the bathroom to confront intruders.
- OP stated that he was sure that an intruder was in toilet because he heard the toilet door slam shut.
- OP stated that he was sure an intruder had climbed up a ladder and entered the bathroom through the window because he heard the bathroom window slam open and the toilet door slam shut.
- OP stated that he kept shifting his attention between the window and the door because other intruders could be on the ladder.
- OP stated that he shot 4 times at the door after he heard "wood moving".
but according to OP himself :
- he did not know if he killed or even wounded the intruder in the toilet.
- he did not know if more intruders were outside and proceeding up the ladder to the bathroom.
basically, the circumstances were exactly the same as when he first heard the window open BUT, for no apparent reason and no explanation, now it is safer to retreat out of the bathroom and take refuge in the bedroom ?!?
Not exactly the same. He knew after the first shot and Reeva's agonised screams that she'd been injured, and then there was utter silence after the following 3 shots. It was now safe for him to go and do whatever he wanted - not that he could say that in court, and I appreciate you were being facetious. What a pity didn't Nel address this. What lame excuse could OP have come up with to answer that?
Of course......it was the difference between the reaction of RS after the first shot and the forth which allowed him to go back into the bedroom in complete security, he knew fully well there was no way that she was going to come out, if this theory holds up then murder it is even if there is a doubt about the intentions of the first shot. For the last three he shot her knowing where she was.Not exactly the same. He knew after the first shot and Reeva's agonised screams that she'd been injured, and then there was utter silence after the following 3 shots. It was now safe for him to go and do whatever he wanted - not that he could say that in court, and I appreciate you were being facetious. What a pity didn't Nel address this. What lame excuse could OP have come up with to answer that?
Not exactly the same. He knew after the first shot and Reeva's agonised screams that she'd been injured, and then there was utter silence after the following 3 shots. It was now safe for him to go and do whatever he wanted - not that he could say that in court, and I appreciate you were being facetious. What a pity didn't Nel address this. What lame excuse could OP have come up with to answer that?
I was analyzing it from OP's version (the fabricated one) where the window plays a crucial role : it is heard opening, slamming, is the entry point of at least 1 intruder which hid in the toilet and is the the entry point of possibly more intruders.
…In what really happened, the only part the window plays is that it provides the means by which OP will fabricate the intruder story to cover up the fact that he deliberately shot Reeva
OP declared she never screamed but then admitted he couldn’t hear!