How do you go about demonstrating for us that the FBI database admits "mish-mashes of contamination"?
You MUST be kidding! THIS CASE is a perfect demonstration that the FBI will admit ANYTHING with 10-markers...regardless of where the 10 markers came from! Remember the words of the experts from CellMark, who couldn't be sure the DNA was from a single donor. Consider their words proof that "mish-mash" and "contamination" are accepted into the CODIS database.
Below is the URL for the FBI CODIS database. Nowhere will you find it said that submitted samples must be proven to be from a single donor:
http://www.fbi.gov/hq/lab/codis/index1.htm
It's not myth that the male DNA from the panties is mixed with the spots of JonBenét's blood.
What is your source for this non-myth? Prove to us that the DNA was not "right next to" the blood spot, instead of "mixed" with it?
It's nothing but a myth based on word games, LP...Face the facts.
Dr Doberson is not a publicity hound by any standard.
Dr Doberson has certainly not impeached himself on the subject of stun gun injuries.
"You really can't tell from a photo," Dobersen said.
(The Boulder Daily Camera - January 13, 1998)
Sorry, but I call that "impeached", BIG time.
Louise Woodward is not mother to the child she was convicted of killing. She has no connection to the Ramsey case.
Hahaha, you consider it important that she was not "Mother" to the child? Her case PROVES a person - ANY PERSON - does not need
pathology to commit murder.
Amateur attempts to "match" the handwriting on the note are just that: amateur.
Dueling experts and their opinions on the handwriting are just that: meaningless. In the end, a jury would be the ones to determine if Patsy wrote the note. The jusy would be all "amateurs", but their own eyes would tell them that nobody but Patsy could have written that note. The exemplars are clear on that fact.
Like it or not, the BPD investigation of the Ramseys that took place over several years resulted in convincing the most experienced detective on the case that the Ramseys were not involved with the death of their daughter.
The "most experienced detective on the case" has been called a "delusional old man" by the other detectives who worked the case. 72 hours after joining the case, without reviewing all the case evidence, he had a brainfart that caused him to pronounce the Ramseys innocent. That amounts to a loss of credibility in any LE book.
John Douglas, a renowned FBI agent who invented profiling, agrees.
John Douglas was paid by John Ramsey to develop a profile for an intruder. He did the job he was hired to do. He can't go back and write a different profile now, or he'll look as stupid as Doberson and Foster.
I believe the male DNA will eventually result in a "hit" on a databank, resulting in an investigation and arrest of the "match" to that DNA.
Plan on taking that belief to your grave.