You can always count on the Ramsey supporters to ignore the facts of evidence and make up their own.
There were only a few identifiable markers in the fingernail DNA taken from JB at autopsy. The samples were degraded beyond use. You can't "match" so few DNA markers to any other sample and claim it proves anything. The number of people who could also have those same markers would be astronomical.
Also the medical examiner's technique for collecting the fingernail sample was so flawed, there is some debate that he used contaminated clippers to collect the fingernail samples. So that DNA may come from another corpse whose DNA hasn't been and never will be tested.
Also, DNA is so sensitive in its sub-molecular level of material, contamination and false-positives are common. That's been proven through research and countless other cases where convicted perps, some who finally confessed, ended up not being the source for confusing DNA found on bodies and at crime scenes. There is no time stamp on DNA, so unless there is accompanying evidence to put someone at the crime during the commission of it, DNA isn't going to convict anyone unless it's semen indisputably linked to abuse/rape, or blood left from a related wound, etc.
The red herring DNA in question in this case is not semen or blood in any sample from this crime. The only blood we are aware of came from JB herself. The unsourced DNA is from skin cells, which I believe is artifact because IF an intruder had left fresh, viable DNA behind that night, there would be much more of it, not just a few cells and fragments.
The location of the "touch" DNA on the waist of the longjohns doesn't change anything. This was the basis for the non-legal "exoneration" of the Ramseys: proclaimed by Mary "John PERV Karr" Lacy as the intruder Holy Grail when she had Bode Technology test the pants, but which (of course) has never been backed up by any legitimate documentation other than "trust us, we said so", Lacy falsely declared this proved there was in intruder. Her reasoning--if you can call it that--was that the markers found by Bode showed the intruder pulled down the longjohns and also left DNA on the crotch of the panties.
In reality, it only proves someone handled those clothes in the same way, but not when or who. Not even the source for the DNA can be stated beyond a reasonable doubt to have been anywhere near these items.
Because DNA can't even be seen with a powerful electron microscope, it's so small, clearly it can be transferred by touching something, as has been proven in research. It doesn't even have to be left by the person who is the source, but can be picked up on the hands or some other item and left behind upon contact that way.
So these DNA strands found on the clothing, most partial--though that is debated--could have come from being handling by forensic testing, from JB herself, even from the actual perp who got them from opening a door or tuirning on a faucet, etc.
So don't believe anyone who tries to sell you a bridge in Brooklyn: nobody knows who the DNA belongs to, when it got on the clothing, or how. Period. It's not blood and it's not semen, so it is hardly proof of any intruder who happened to also write like Patsy and managed to leave NOT ONE OTHER PIECE OF EVIDENCE BEHIND LEADING TO ANOTHER HUMAN BEING, though he is supposed to have spent hours in the silent home, brutally torturing and murdering a child while her family slept like the dead nearby.