Regarding someone claiming that important documents were found at TES and the suggestion that they are; therefore, missing from the TES comprehensive docs at Mr. Nejame's office...that is simply not a true account of what happened. This is where rumors get to be a mess.
The other documents that were located later at TES in Texas where there is one lone volunteer clerk, were indeed added to the voluminous documents that await inspection by the defense. Moreover, and this is important, 02/26/2010 Notice of Additional Documents in the Possession of Texas Equusearch ... was filed by Mr. Nejame to alert the court, the defense and prosecutors that indeed they were supplementing
( adding to ) the records, because Mr. Nejmae understands the rules . He respects that the order of the judge is ongoing and this is what is done , according to the rules , when more information or documentation is discovered. There is no reason, whatsoever, for anyone to claim otherwise. TES and Mr. Nejame abide by the rules and are beyond reproach in that aspect.
I am so thankful for those that are careful to post the links, etc so we can continue to enjoy the reputation of excellence here at WebSleuths, compared to rumor and gossip boards. Here Mr. Nejame explains again the sequence of events.
— April 05, 2010 —
http://www.wftv.com/video/23056801/in...
Part 1 -
Forty seven minute mark is where Mark explains that the additional documents were located, and immediately, as they are required to do under the rules, they filed notice on the record that indeed there are a few more documents. The documents were added to the comprehensive documents at Mr. Nejame's office. This is a charity that relies on donations and is very very low on funds. If ever the defense would have come by and made a honest effort to review the documents, they would have seen them already. Those documents have sat at his office ,all these many months with no requests, no phone call, they were available all along, they remain available. Yes they recently went briefly to Mark's office and promptly turned on their heels and left. I would hardly characterize it as a good faith effort.[/B] Mr. Nejame arguing to the judge,
"A capitol murder case demands a lot more than not coming by my office, and reviewing these documents if indeed the documents are so relevant! The defense motion is in very VERY bad faith!"
Part 2 -
http://www.wftv.com/video/23057236/in...
filed with the Clerk's office 2/26 by Nejame's office.
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/27552747...al-Docs-Notice
According to this notice, Baez scheduled a meeting 6 months ago ( at the time of the filing it was six months) to look at all the docs, canceled the meeting and has never rescheduled.....yet Baez continued to file frivolous motions to get the docs, even though he had access to them.
Nejame slaps down defense motion, asks for fees
http://www.wftv.com/news/22535671/detail.html
The lawyer for TES expected that the defense would retract their accusation that he released the TES documents to the press. When they did not, he filed a motion with the court, responding to that and their requests for all of the documents. The very experienced Mr. Nejame, sets out the defense is out of line, and has their facts wrong. Again.
Nejame asks the court to award TES attorney fees.
snip
"He has caused unnecessary attorney time and Court time to be wasted, especially since he has been fully advised of its misrepresentations and inaccuracies and nevertheless continues to proceed," NeJame wrote.
Now this is a motion.
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22534497/detail.html
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask off the ole Lone Ranger
And you don't mess around with TIM
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhqKH9Z_J-U[/ame]
Originally Posted by The World According
The fact that they made the appointment is very , very important...because unlike what they pretend....obviously they knew the records were available to them to come and review. I know that Mark will mop the floor with the defense over this glaring fact.
Six months!!!!
What in the world?! Are they waiting for Dr. Lee?
I hope the court does award attorney fees to send a message that this is getting old.
________________________________________
http://www.wftv.com/news/22535671/detail.html
The lawyer for TES expected that the defense would retract their accusation that he released the TES documents to the press. When they did not, he filed a motion with the court, responding to that and their requests for all of the documents. The very experienced Mr. Nejame, sets out the defense is out of line, and has their facts wrong. Again.
Nejame asks the court to award TES attorney fees.
snip
"He has caused unnecessary attorney time and Court time to be wasted, especially since he has been fully advised of its misrepresentations and inaccuracies and nevertheless continues to proceed," NeJame wrote.
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rp-TNj55rls[/ame]
My favorite line here: "I am being OVERLY GENEROUS IN MY CHARACTERIZATION" , Mr. Nejame argued to the judge regarding the defense.
Our own Mr. Hornsby: " The state is preparing their rebuttal case. "
After the defense has put on their case..The searchers that may claim they searched and the remains were not there..."The prosecution is going to come back with their rebuttal and just destroy them....demonstrate that their witnesses with showing that they are misleading, were dishonest or just plain wrong about what they remember, " Mr. Hornsby said.
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1XhJhCVSyw[/ame]
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HH2EcHM0_8[/ame]
Two minute mark...priceless. Mark takes them to school!!!According to Mark, "The Defendant, through her counsel, has alleged that Joe Jordan's name was not among the 32 searchers identified by TES and none of his reports were disclosed to the defense. This is a misrepresentation of the facts as Mr. Jordan's name and signature are on the Field Activity Form 08-895 dated September 1, 2008, which was hand delivered to counsel for defendant. They haphazardly filed the Motion to Modify the Court's Order .A simple visit to the undersigned's office and a perusal of the documents would have illuminated the correct information."
The Defendant, through her counsel, is unnecessarily wasting this Honorable Court's time, the taxpayer's money and the undersigned's resources by filling these frivolous motions.However, it is counsel for Defendant who has frustrated and circumvented these efforts, while attempting to shirk his responsibilities and blame others for his inaction....TES respectfully asks this Honorable Court to assess attorney's fees against the counsel for the Defendant, especially since he has been advised of the inaccuracy of the defendant's motion and has failed to take any remedial actions".
View attachment 9411
