Winward1
Active Member
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2010
- Messages
- 752
- Reaction score
- 192
Good morning all. You may know I commented yesterday on the recent information regarding Thoresen, and the Morrison-Means case, as well as both the lack of comments, but also interest it has drawn in some places.
I also noted it is curious some people who otherwise always seem to be commenting, if not dredging up, the same old information on the same old suspects, mailings, and seemingly unrelated cases (often ones that occurred/surfaced after Thoresen was dead) which go nowhere, have been silent regarding him, except to occasionally slam him as a suspect without saying why.
Case in point, one “Babs Cash” surfaced yesterday in a Zodiac Facebook group. In her new writings she explained it has “been awhile since I last posted,” and she “had to take a break.”
Then she launched into an essay about thrilling Zodiac suspect Larry (yawn) Kane, who she is “pretty much certain” is Zodiac. Then she posted another expansive essay, with photos, on the Donna Lass case.
Lass, of course, died after Thoresen. I don’t know about you, but given the new info on Thorsen, the fact that “Babs” felt the need to surface at this time and posit expansively using old information to support a weak theory which implies Zodiac was still alive in the fall of ’70…well you might recall what I said about the public being played for chumps. (It's not just that they do it. It's that they are so bad at doing it.)
Yes, you can accuse me of trying to hawk my book (I only gave you a taste of it here. I put together a lot more on Thoresen, much of it documented with never before seen stuff. It’s not much more than the price of a couple of beers.) But at least you know I’m not some spook who is probably being paid to post this crap in order to keep you from learning Thoresen was Zodiac, and a whole lot more, eh?
https://www.amazon.com/Zodiac-Maniac-Secret-History-Killer ebook/dp/B07XYDYWQT/ref=tmm_kin_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1590026275&sr=8-1
I also noted it is curious some people who otherwise always seem to be commenting, if not dredging up, the same old information on the same old suspects, mailings, and seemingly unrelated cases (often ones that occurred/surfaced after Thoresen was dead) which go nowhere, have been silent regarding him, except to occasionally slam him as a suspect without saying why.
Case in point, one “Babs Cash” surfaced yesterday in a Zodiac Facebook group. In her new writings she explained it has “been awhile since I last posted,” and she “had to take a break.”
Then she launched into an essay about thrilling Zodiac suspect Larry (yawn) Kane, who she is “pretty much certain” is Zodiac. Then she posted another expansive essay, with photos, on the Donna Lass case.
Lass, of course, died after Thoresen. I don’t know about you, but given the new info on Thorsen, the fact that “Babs” felt the need to surface at this time and posit expansively using old information to support a weak theory which implies Zodiac was still alive in the fall of ’70…well you might recall what I said about the public being played for chumps. (It's not just that they do it. It's that they are so bad at doing it.)
Yes, you can accuse me of trying to hawk my book (I only gave you a taste of it here. I put together a lot more on Thoresen, much of it documented with never before seen stuff. It’s not much more than the price of a couple of beers.) But at least you know I’m not some spook who is probably being paid to post this crap in order to keep you from learning Thoresen was Zodiac, and a whole lot more, eh?
https://www.amazon.com/Zodiac-Maniac-Secret-History-Killer ebook/dp/B07XYDYWQT/ref=tmm_kin_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1590026275&sr=8-1
Attachments
Last edited: