Horace Finklestein
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2008
- Messages
- 5,658
- Reaction score
- 1
He mentioned psychoanalysis...I have to wonder what century he's living in.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I just listened to the interview and I'm relieved to read that others feel about it the same way I do. Creepy is a good word for it. The doctor himself sounded rather obsessed with Casey's looks and her body, yet he claims George was all that!
For crying out loud -- hamburger! He was so descriptive! How disturbing was that?
The doctor trashes George, makes diagnoses and accusations without having met the people, blames Casey's grandparents, plus George and Cindy, yet gives Casey a pass because it "wasn't her fault". Give me a break. So he wants us to believe Casey killed Caylee because grandpa Plesea was placed in an orphanage as a boy? Yeah, sure, that's plausible. :banghead:
Does this "doctor" not understand the concept of people taking charge of their own lives, being responsible for their own actions? Does he not realize that many grandchildren of "orphans" don't kill their own children? Does he not realize Casey alone was responsible for her actions, whether or not she had been abused as a child?
Didn't like his snide remarks about Jeff Ashton, not one bit.
Gotta, hand it to our Tricia for keeping cool in an absurd situation.
So he writes a book about people he's never met, about situations he didn't examine closely, about "facts" he's embellished, and overlooked key material. Plus he disses Jeff Ashton. :shakehead:
Some people will do anything for a buck...and 15 minutes of fame.
I just listened to the interview and I'm relieved to read that others feel about it the same way I do. Creepy is a good word for it. The doctor himself sounded rather obsessed with Casey's looks and her body, yet he claims George was all that!
For crying out loud -- hamburger! He was so descriptive! How disturbing was that?
The doctor trashes George, makes diagnoses and accusations without having met the people, blames Casey's grandparents, plus George and Cindy, yet gives Casey a pass because it "wasn't her fault". Give me a break. So he wants us to believe Casey killed Caylee because grandpa Plesea was placed in an orphanage as a boy? Yeah, sure, that's plausible. :banghead:
Does this "doctor" not understand the concept of people taking charge of their own lives, being responsible for their own actions? Does he not realize that many grandchildren of "orphans" don't kill their own children? Does he not realize Casey alone was responsible for her actions, whether or not she had been abused as a child?
Didn't like his snide remarks about Jeff Ashton, not one bit.
Gotta, hand it to our Tricia for keeping cool in an absurd situation.
So he writes a book about people he's never met, about situations he didn't examine closely, about "facts" he's embellished, and overlooked key material. Plus he disses Jeff Ashton. :shakehead:
Some people will do anything for a buck...and 15 minutes of fame.
I just read a part of Ablow's book ..in it he says George was so happy with the birth of Caylee he did not take an interest in who her father was etc.....
What is being forgotten or missed by Mr Ablow is that Casey had told Jesse and her parents that he, Jesse, was the father of her baby and until the paternity tests came back that proved otherwise, George and Cindy both thought Jesse was the father during that time in the delivery room.
According to the 1930 Census, County Children's Home, Warren, Ohio, grandpa Plesea wasn't there alone. His two older brothers and older sister were with him. The doctor made it sound as if Grandpa was dumped there without his siblings.
So my question is: Did those other siblings grow up to have grandchildren who murdered their young children?
The census can be found at Ancestry.com and Heritage Quest. I don't know if I'm allowed to post my file here. They're listed on the census page as "Pelesea". Ancestry lists them as "Pellesea". I've submitted a name correction but the errors will remain.
Thanks for the Info Zoe, I didn't realize he wasn't the only child in the family who was there. Re the name spelling, I note my grandparents and great grand parents changed the spelling of their last names from European to more Anglicized spellings as the generations went along, without benefit of name changes so perhaps that's what the spelling is all about.
It's true name changes occurred. On census records however, mistakes happened all the time. My point was to give all versions of the name in case anyone wanted to search for them. My addition to ancestry.com was to add today's version of the spelling so it could be found more easily by anyone searching.
Also on the 1930 census, the four children are in the orphanage while daddy and his new wife are living alone.
According to the 1930 Census, County Children's Home, Warren, Ohio, grandpa Plesea wasn't there alone. His two older brothers and older sister were with him. The doctor made it sound as if Grandpa was dumped there without his siblings.
So my question is: Did those other siblings grow up to have grandchildren who murdered their young children?
The census can be found at Ancestry.com and Heritage Quest. I don't know if I'm allowed to post my file here. They're listed on the census page as "Pelesea". Ancestry lists them as "Pellesea". I've submitted a name correction but the errors will remain.
Sorry Zoe, wasn't trying to do a correction on you if that's what it sounded like - more musing on name changes and you've done some great sleuthing.
My mother's family name in three generations went from whaaa? to easily North American. Do you think the children were in the orphanage because the parents didn't want them or was it a case of "the dirty 30's" when we didn't have a social structure like welfare, food stamps or food banks and people who didn't live on a farm were often literally starving. This is when men began hopping trains to criss cross the country looking for work and were known as "hobo's".
I understand.
Orphanages had many half-orphans in them even before the Great Depression. It was probably a convenient way to have the children looked after if the remaining parent had to travel for work, had many children to take care of, or had very young children, plus it was a way for the children to have food, a roof over their heads, and schooling. I've seen more cases of widowed fathers placing their children in orphanages than mothers, but it happened both ways, for sure.
I couldn't begin to guess why the Plesea children were there after their father found a new wife. It was just a fact. I brought it up because Dr. Ablow made it sound like Cindy's dad was the only child of that family placed there and he wasn't. :waitasec:
So this good doctor thinks it was a mercy killing? (Just read that in the Current News thread.)
Do gumball machines dispense degrees?
So this good doctor thinks it was a mercy killing? (Just read that in the Current News thread.)
Do gumball machines dispense degrees?