Dogface
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2009
- Messages
- 2,734
- Reaction score
- 435
And, I still love Dr. Phil. I don't agree with him on this. And I think there was a conflict of interest, but alas, I'll always respect him. I've watched him for years and more or less know how he works. I trust his judgement (usually) and we (usually) agree on just about everything, I've watched him since I was about 11 and I have always respected him. I honestly thought he'd go RDI, but the second I saw John Ramsey I knew it was hopeless. I don't think we're crazy conspiray theorists, just people who aren't afraid to look into the family because we know that sadly, yes a parent/brother/whatever could do this to their daughter.
The only "evidence" they have is the terrible DNA. Dr. Phil would be the one to rely on "science" and "the facts" but that alone can NOT convince me that an intruder committed that crime. I'm open to all theories and yes, it IS possible an intruder did it. But looking at the evidence, the situation, the theories, I ALWAYS come back to RDI. Every show, every interview, clearly has one bias about who did it. The other CBS special on just hours after the Dr. Phil one is way RDI. Wonder what Dr. Phil's thoughts would be after seeing their analysis.
So like everyone else, I'm disappointed by the interview, and confused as to how Dr. Phil was so quick to accept they were innocent because of one slight DNA sample and Burke's creepy denial. Oh well, I'll still watch him. Can't have it all.
That's how I feel. I'm a huge DP fan and my husband jokes he is my "tv husband" and that I would listen to Dr. Phil over him any day of the week. (Probably true) I guess this is just a rough patch in our marriage.
And I may have misheard the age of the other victim, very rarely do I get to sit and watch a show without interruption.