Early Parole and Missed Opportunities-What happened?

[nursebeeme]

http://www.lvcountyed.org/data/usp_info.htm

everyone have a peek at this (great site on the USP which is my neighbor)

btw... we are stationed at fort leavenworth and are walled in by prisons! The military prison is on post of which they are adding onto again and the usp (united states pen). There are also 13 OTHER prisons in Leavenworth county.

 

[nursebeeme]

Ok - first - here's the quote about LE saying they needed a warrant. Came from the neighbor's call about the tents in the backyard and children living back there.




Erika Pratt said that two years ago, she called police after seeing what looked like a living compound with tents and sheds.

No warrant
Sheriff's deputies came to ask questions, Pratt said, but they told her that because they didn't have a warrant, they couldn't search the house.
"I always wished someone could do something about it," Pratt said. "It was like he was charging people to live there."



http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/08/27/BA0Q19EMR7.DTL#ixzz0PRbnnZS7

Still looking for the article about the parole violation in 93. Nevermind - my good buddy nursie found it.

too bad the idiot didn't run the guy's name before he responded to the 911 call! Hell they do more in terms of running your name if you are speeding than someone calling in on a sex maniac with kids in tents in his backyard! I mean REALLY! A simple run of his name would have shown the guy WAS ON PAROLE AND HE THUSLY WOULD NOT NEED A WARRANT!!!!!!!! UGGGGGGGGHHHHH!!!!!

hindsight is 20/20... too bad LE's "fore"sight was 20/50!!! or better yet legally blind!

(deep breaths... nurse taking deep breaths!!!)

kudos go to linask on finding those prison dates... thank you linask! Wonder what the did to violate parole?

 

[Wise Old Owl]

Ok what do we have?

Paroled from Leavenworth 1988 sent to nevada

Nevada paroled 1988 (like a revolving door from Leavenworth)

Katherine C. (victim that convicted him) spoke with parole officer after "spotting" him at her work Approx 89/90 - Parole officer's snarky remark about "sick puppy" and offending again - just not HER"

Jaycee taken 1991

PG BACK BEHIND BARS from 4/93 to 8/93 for Parole Violation that we have no clue as to what.

1999 Released from FEDERAL parole for good. Still saying he's on LIFETIME parole - which we believe came from Nevada and the rape / LIFE conviction.

2005 (give or take I can't remember) he's is "investigated" on an elder abuse / extortion charge with the old man next door. Nothing ever came out of it - old man put in nursing home $18K missing, and PG now has full care and control over that property - until sometime in 2006 when new owner bought it and again in

2006 That new owner's girlfriend called about the tents and children living in the backyard and she was told they couldn't do anything because of "no warrant" - yet another "lackey" not doing his job - sheriff deputy never ran PG through nothing to see status so - without that VITAL info - sure, the no warrant statement is right to appease a concerned citizen - But even SHE told the deputy that PG was an RSO.

I predict there will be many, many, many heads gonna roll over this one before its done.

 

[nursebeeme]

Ok what do we have?

Paroled from Leavenworth 1988 sent to nevada

Nevada paroled 1988 (like a revolving door from Leavenworth)

Katherine C. (victim that convicted him) spoke with parole officer after "spotting" him at her work Approx 89/90 - Parole officer's snarky remark about "sick puppy" and offending again - just not HER"

Jaycee taken 1991

PG BACK BEHIND BARS from 4/93 to 8/93 for Parole Violation that we have no clue as to what.

1999 Released from FEDERAL parole for good. Still saying he's on LIFETIME parole - which we believe came from Nevada and the rape / LIFE conviction.

2005 (give or take I can't remember) he's is "investigated" on an elder abuse / extortion charge with the old man next door. Nothing ever came out of it - old man put in nursing home $18K missing, and PG now has full care and control over that property - until sometime in 2006 when new owner bought it and again in

2006 That new owner's girlfriend called about the tents and children living in the backyard and she was told they couldn't do anything because of "no warrant" - yet another "lackey" not doing his job - sheriff deputy never ran PG through nothing to see status so - without that VITAL info - sure, the no warrant statement is right to appease a concerned citizen - But even SHE told the deputy that PG was an RSO.

I predict there will be many, many, many heads gonna roll over this one before its done.

the parole violation was federal... california is handling the nevada lifetime parole on interstate compact (to add to your list)

 

[Wise Old Owl]

the parole violation was federal... california is handling the nevada lifetime parole on interstate compact (to add to your list)

Do we know that? Or was it both? He was on Federal parole until 1999 - so 1993 he was still under Federal parole and he IS on LIFETIME parole from Nevada transferred to California. So this '93 parole violation was for both? How does that work? Who decides WHICH parole (God that sounds so stupid - "which" parole) has jurisdiction to be violated? Or is it WHAT he did that decides which parole is violated or is it just "assumed" that any parole violation constitutes BOTH paroles as being violated.

(((((((((((My head is dizzy - does that make any sense?))))))))))

 

[Patty G]

Ok - first - here's the quote about LE saying they needed a warrant. Came from the neighbor's call about the tents in the backyard and children living back there.




Erika Pratt said that two years ago, she called police after seeing what looked like a living compound with tents and sheds.

No warrant
Sheriff's deputies came to ask questions, Pratt said, but they told her that because they didn't have a warrant, they couldn't search the house.
"I always wished someone could do something about it," Pratt said. "It was like he was charging people to live there."



http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/08/27/BA0Q19EMR7.DTL#ixzz0PRbnnZS7

Still looking for the article about the parole violation in 93. Nevermind - my good buddy nursie found it.

So it was the neighbor who said: "they couldn't search the house because they didn't have a search warrant."

Is there anything where LE either verbally or written indicating "they didn't have a search warrant so they couldn't search the house?"

 

[Wise Old Owl]

So it was the neighbor who said: "they couldn't search the house because they didn't have a search warrant."

Is there anything where LE either verbally or written indicating "they didn't have a search warrant so they couldn't search the house?"

you might check that very first press conference by the Contra Costa County Sheriff - Rupf - his name was - big tall gentlemen - grandfartherly looking guy. I remember he talked in depth about that deputy that investigated the "tents in backyard" complaint. I do know he (the sheriff) said that the deputy never ran PG through the system to see his status.

 

[nursebeeme]

Do we know that? Or was it both? He was on Federal parole until 1999 - so 1993 he was still under Federal parole and he IS on LIFETIME parole from Nevada transferred to California. So this '93 parole violation was for both? How does that work? Who decides WHICH parole (God that sounds so stupid - "which" parole) has jurisdiction to be violated? Or is it WHAT he did that decides which parole is violated or is it just "assumed" that any parole violation constitutes BOTH paroles as being violated.

(((((((((((My head is dizzy - does that make any sense?))))))))))

upstream Linask posted the link that said the parole violation was federal. And this is where the disconnection started to crumble I believe! The federal system SHOULD have notified Nevada or California since they had interstate compact authority as one violation of parole would have made Nevada make him serve the rest of his sentence IF THEY HAD KNOWN. Let me go back and get the article...brb

 

[nursebeeme]

No cohesiveness between Fed or State

Available federal and state parole records show that Phillip Garrido was released from a Nevada prison in 1988 only to violate his federal parole in California five years later.

But Garrido, suspected of kidnapping Jaycee Lee Dugard from South Lake Tahoe in 1991, served just a four months in federal prison for the parole violation in 1993.
Nevada officials were never informed of his parole violation.

“If we had been notified of that we would have done a retake,” said Gail Powell, spokeswoman for the Nevada Department of Public Safety. She said he would have been brought back to serve the remainder of his sentence in Carson City.
“We were never informed,” she said. “I don’t know why.”
http://www.rgj.com/article/20090828/NEWS/90828055/1321

the above post was by Linask

 

[Wise Old Owl]

I gotcha nursie!! He violated - the 4 months was for Federal violation and the Fed "should" have notified Nevada because he's on LIFETIME there and even ONE violation would have sent him up the river - but Nevada was NEVER notified.

Wow.

 

[nursebeeme]

Federal records show Garrido violated his federal parole in 1993, but Nevada officials were not informed and didn’t know about the violation until being asked about it by the Reno Gazette-Journal on Friday.

http://www.rgj.com/article/20090828/NEWS/90828055/1321

maybe the answer to federal and state communication is THE FREAKING MEDIA! I mean really??? The first they heard of it!

 

[nursebeeme]

you might check that very first press conference by the Contra Costa County Sheriff - Rupf - his name was - big tall gentlemen - grandfartherly looking guy. I remember he talked in depth about that deputy that investigated the "tents in backyard" complaint. I do know he (the sheriff) said that the deputy never ran PG through the system to see his status.

yes! And in his interview he also said that they guy was an excellent officer and he had no plans to punish him for it... okay... that is breakdown in the system number (I forget what number we are on!!!! there have been so many in this case)

Another lost chance to learn from a mistake. Great.

 

[Wise Old Owl]

AND - THAT all took place BEFORE Jaycee had her first child. He and the subhuman female had her in capitivity in '93 though. This is going to be a fascinating case to follow the "civil" suit that will arise (and believe you me - IT WILL ARISE). I personally don't see a leg either California, Nevada and the Fed have to stand on - ALL THREE dropped the ball.

 

[nursebeeme]

I think they dropped the ball, stepped on it, ran it over with a mack truck, and sent it to rot in a landfill somewhere!

 

[LinasK]

F.Y.I. Lake Tahoe encompasses both California and Nevada. The border runs through the lake. All you have to do to cross the border, is cross the street signal at Stateline, where the casinos are and you are in Nevada. Reno is not far from Tahoe. The city of South Lake Tahoe is in California, as is Meyers.

 

[ChaCha]

http://www.news10.net/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=66029

SACRAMENTO, CA - Although Phillip Garrido kidnapped Jaycee Dugard and raised a secret family under the noses of multiple parole agents in two jurisdictions, a California parole official defended the process.

"There's no doubt this criminal fooled a lot of jurisdictions for a long time," said Scott Kernan, and undersecretary at the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. "I have no sense of embarrassment for my department. I think they acted appropriately."

 

[Wise Old Owl]

A federal court official said Garrido violated the terms of his parole while living in northern California in 1993 and was returned to federal custody for four months. The official did not have specific information about the parole violation.


I want this question answered now!!!!! :furious: :furious: :furious:

 

[nursebeeme]

ITA.. what did he do to violate his federal parole? I think that I will email the news outlet that first reported on it... seems like they are the only ones getting any answers!

 

[ThoughtFox]

Such a tragedy ~ I almost can't believe this, but then again, I do believe it.

 

[mysteriew]

Jailed kidnap monster Phillip Garrido's chilling letter asked judge to give him a second chance

Just one year into a half-century sentence for kidnapping and raping a woman in 1976, Phillip Garrido claimed he was rehabilitated and deserved a second chance.

He sent a chilling handwritten note to a Nevada judge in March 1978 boasting of his “progress” and requesting a chance for parole in eight years.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nat...hilling_letter_asked_judge_to_give_him_a.html