Psychosis isn't anywhere near that consistent or logical. She may have taken the clothes off when she was alone on the roof, then tossed them off the building into the alley/parking lot, laid them down where they were blown away by wind, or some rooftop visitor may have done something with them.
Some people suffering from psychosis are capable of switching from paranoid/self-conscious to uninhibited from one moment to the next (which is what the elevator video probably illustrates, in my opinion). Psychosis doesn't follow logic, as anyone who has witnessed a bad trip can attest to... which leads me to this post:
(trimmed for space
)
Your feeling that it's "too easy" of an explanation doesn't mean it isn't true. I see the logic you're using, but I do think it's flawed. I wonder if you're familiar with psychosis. As another post above mentioned, it can take on varied behaviors in different people, and their own personalities can play a fairly big role.
Generally, I feel like the most obvious answer to an investigation is where you should start. From the evidence the public has, I feel like psychosis-related death is the most obvious explanation.
As for a psychosis being a scapegoat theory to easily explain any inconsistencies or strange behaviors, I would argue that it's a far more realistic scenario than many of the highly-speculative
moo
scenarios people have attributed to this case. The concept of psychosis is fully grounded in reality, and its signature is present in aspects of this incident and evidence/history behind it.
