If his sentiment is that automated systems have become relied upon too heavily then I wholeheartedly agree with him.
Discussion has been ongoing for years in the American press that as aircraft flight becomes more automated pilots are trained less to know how to fly a plane manually. What happens when the automated systems fail? Technology is not infallible.
I actually agree with your sentiment. It's what Trump said that I vehemently disagree with. It's not about technology being too complicated but rather pilot proficiency being lacking.
What Trump said was:
"Airplanes are becoming far too complex to fly. Pilots are no longer needed, but rather computer scientists from MIT. I see it all the time in many products. Always seeking to go one unnecessary step further, when often old and simpler is far better. Split second decisions are....
....needed, and the complexity creates danger. All of this for great cost yet very little gain. I don’t know about you, but I don’t want Albert Einstein to be my pilot. I want great flying professionals that are allowed to easily and quickly take control of a plane!
"
Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) | Twitter
What stuck in my craw was Trump saying "...often old and simpler is far better," and "All of this for great cost yet very little gain."
He implies that the "old" ways are better and the gains (of modern technology) are little. This is patently untrue.
Aviation technology has vastly improved flight safety as evidenced by the reduction of crashes due to the introduction of instruments such as Wind Shear Detection Systems (1990s) and Ground Proximity Warning Systems (GPWS, 1970s) along with the more recent improved Terrain Awareness Warning System (TAWS, 2000s) which lowered the number of crashes due to Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT). These and other recently introduced warning systems have increased air safety significantly.
Trump also says that "Pilots are no longer needed, but rather computer scientists from MIT." That's also false.
As I understand it, this entire fiasco is a result of Boeing making one poor design decision (having just one hardware sensor input to MCAS), together with an assumption that competent pilots would be able to recognize when there was a problem, and hit the cut-off switches. Those cut-off switches exist on every 737, not just the new Max.
What's happening is that worldwide air travel is exploding, and there is a major shortage of pilots. Airlines in other countries are scrambling to find pilots, and using shortcuts to get them in the seats. The pilot of the Ethiopian Airline crash might have had a lot of hours, but he was 28 years old. The co-pilot had only 200 hours, which is insane for that level of responsibility for passenger lives.
Boeing's decision on how to design MCAS assumed competent pilots, period. That's the problem, but it's not easy for them to say, because they need to sell these planes to airlines in emerging countries, with rushed pilot training and pilots who don't know how to fly an aircraft when the automation is off. The fast track to getting a 737 Max seat in a place like Indonesia or Ethiopia doesn't start with learning how to hand-fly a Cessna 172. They start in the simulator and graduate rapidly to being responsible for the lives of 200 people behind them.
So IMO it isn't about needing an MIT degree or doing away with aviation technology but rather needing pilots who have been competently trained in the first place. All MOO.