I thought the As' attorneys did a good job of presenting the argument. HHJP will want to deny it IMO
, so he will have to say either (1) GA and CA are not "next of kin" or (2) CA and GA's constitutional rights as "next of kin" are trumped by KC's constitutional right to a fair trial (which would include not having witnesses who have shown that they cannot keep their stories straight from one proceeding to the next further tainted by watching other witnesses testify).
Interesting how GA and CA say that, because Caylee's closest relatives are Casey
AND LEE, if CA and GA can't be there, then "no one" will be there to represent Caylee's interests. Really? IMO Lee would be a more appropriate choice as a representative of Caylee than CA and GA.