There is some discussion upthread questioning the efficacy of doing the 3 procedures Jahi had separately. Please reference the links in my post a couple up, on pediatric obesity and sleep apnea. The "two" procedures, UPPP and adenotonsillectomy occur at the same time. There really wouldn't be any indication to "separately" perform these procedures when the intent is to attempt to correct sleep apnea. They are "paired" procedures with the UPPP. The only reason to do "just" a UPPP is if the patient has had tonsils removed some time in the distant past. The nasal turbinate surgery "can" be performed as a stand alone procedure, but I can't think of any reason to do so if the pt is undergoing UPPP to "open up" their airways to more airflow. The risks of another General Anesthetic far outweigh the risks of the few minutes of extra surgical time.
This case has been persistently presented as a tonsillectomy gone wrong, and not as a complex surgery for sleep apnea and other sequelae related to pediatric morbid obesity. When the case first reached the national news, I was as captivated as everyone by the reports of a "routine" T & A and brain death. I knew immediately there was much more to the story that wasn't being told. And when I saw the first pictures of Jahi (where she is both very cute with a great smile, AND clearly morbidly obese with a lot of facial and upper body adipose), I knew with 90+% certainty that she was having sleep apnea procedures, not "just" a tonsillectomy.
This persistent presentation in news articles of "healthy" and "elective", IMO, is denial of the very serious issues this young girl faced in her condition in the months and years leading up to surgery, and in the hours and days after surgery. She didn't develop the need for the surgery over a few months; this is a situation of very long standing--years. It also does nothing to educate the public about the very serious risks of this kind of surgery in obese children and teens.
I posted a few days ago that the only reason I can think of why this very obvious condition of the surgery being needed due to her morbid obesity and co-morbidities is that these medical issues are being minimized and omitted in news articles out of some worries about appearing to "blame the victim" for her size and complications. No one wants to appear to engage in "fat shaming" in a catastrophe such as this, but there are ways for reporters to respectfully phrase their words and present a far more accurate picture of why this young girl was undergoing this complex surgery. It is hard enough to discuss obesity and health in general articles,. It is even harder to understand and accept the impact of these issues when you see the face of a cute young teen, facing many physical, physiological, social, and psychological complications of her size. It breaks your heart to see a child like this, and I am sure with all my soul that Jahi's mother was very worried about her daughter's size, and the impact on her health and future. I understand why she considered and brought Jahi for the surgery. I ache for the guilt she feels and expressed in that article. I think the mother did what the doctors recommended to try to begin to help Jahi with her weight and other health problems. I don't think she fully understood Jahi's risks, but I do think she is a wonderful, loving mother trying to help her child. I have tremendous sympathy for her.
But for the news reporters and articles written, I believe it is extremely misleading to the general public to frame this catastrophic situation as just a routine elective tonsillectomy gone wrong in a healthy young teen.
A collection of postoperative events lead to her cardiac arrest. She was bleeding badly enough to have 4 units of blood. And now she is brain dead on a ventilator, with the family in extreme denial about the reality of her condition.
There are hug gaps in what we know about what happened in the ICU. It will all come out later-- of that I'm certain. The family will be compensated for their tremendous loss-- and hopefully it won't need to be in the court system very long. "Even" if the staff did everything "right" in her care, and still she had complications and died, the fact that she is brain dead from an elective procedure (elective, meaning non-emergency), means that the hospital will take out the checkbook to compensate the family. If things happened that should not have happened, the check will be bigger.
Because of this case, there may even be a moratorium on pedes sleep apnea surgeries at that hospital for a while, until a thorough review of the procedures and hospital care can be done. I think that would be a good thing. But I am not ready to condemn the entire OR, PACU, and ICU staff for inadequate care until I learn more about what happened.