Hopefully they will donate it to a children's charity, in her name. But, I am not sure what the state laws say about what happens to that money, since it was donated for transportation costs.
I'm guessing it will go to the "attorney" they hired.
Hopefully they will donate it to a children's charity, in her name. But, I am not sure what the state laws say about what happens to that money, since it was donated for transportation costs.
[Jahi's uncle, Omari Sealey, told reporters late in the afternoon that the family has now contracted with the New York facility and arranged for medical transport. But Singer said documentation indicating that the facility will accept her appears "faulty."]
Source:
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-jahi-mcmath-20131230,0,3497539.story#axzz2oyc1bHpN
This is an excerpt from the source listed above.
Yikes...is the family submitting fake paperwork or is the hospital playing dirty?
Her heart DOES not beat on it's own. LinasK.
Her heart beats because oxygenated air is pumped into her lungs.
One of the tests of brainstem function it to shut off the ventilator and see if there are spontaneous respirations. When the 6 board certified Neurologist did this, she did not have spontaneous respirations. 1-2 minutes without respirations and her heart stops beating.
I don't think you are qualified to apportion "blame". Have you seen the medical records? Have your read the operative report, the ICU care sheets? Have you talked to any of the physicians or nurses who cared for her? Have you read the autopsy report? Please show us the objective data.
Oh, of course. No doubt. I think the representation that a pediatrician thinks she's alive is lame. Even more so if it's that guy and he "visited." I posted above that I think the Stanford doc is irrefutable. As someone said upthread, if he's proven wrong (like, literally proven wrong -- not just disagreed with by a different expert for hire) I'll never trust another doc or hospital in my life. Seriously. Imo, he's the pinnacle and if he's wrong...well. But I have no doubt that he's correct.
jmo
You don't know what's been going on behind the scenes. Doesn't matter if it was 4PM, he made the deadline with an hour to spare. We the general public won't know all the details, and that's allright- it's not a murder trial with sunshine laws and it's none of our business!!!
You asked what Jahi wanted. Her heart beats on it's own, her body is still alive.
You asked what Jahi wanted. Her heart beats on it's own, her body is still alive. I am placing blame for her condition on Children's Hospital- they alone are responsible for the condition she is in. Otherwise, she'd be on Winter Break from school right now and enjoying her family and continuing her life. It doesn't matter what any of us thinks of as quality of life, only what the families wishes are.:twocents: In My Opinion
No, Children's Hospital screwed up another tonsillectomy two years ago and the little girl is brain-damaged. The family successfully sued for malpractice and won. She does NOT need to be dead to proceed with a lawsuit.
Has CHO changed its terms for transfering Jahi? If so, I've not yet read that.
I've only heard from the family that the Coroner signed-off but the hospital claims the opposite.
This is not about relocating a living patient but instead involves removing a deceased one. Before you ask, Jahi is deceased from the hospital's determination, approved by the Court. CHO does NOT need the family's consent to remove Jahi from support and then to move a deceased individual to an approrpiate location.
~jmo~
Link please. ty
If the standard was that the two doctors could not be affiliated with the hospital then why did the hospital not follow the standard?
I think a video showing the patient reacting to her mother might also carry a lot of weight with a Court in deciding if such a patient meets the legal definition of death. These are very interesting legal issues but the failure of the hospital to follow the standard in evaluation for brain death does merit further investigation, imo.
And what is that new evidence? ty
I totally agree with what you commented. I had wondered if her organs could maintain viability and if so for how long. They could be saving living people with these organs instead of what they are doing. jmo
Jahi did not want the surgery, Jahi wants to live, she's only 13.
Oh, of course. No doubt. I think the representation that a pediatrician thinks she's alive is lame. Even more so if it's that guy and he "visited." I posted above that I think the Stanford doc is irrefutable. As someone said upthread, if he's proven wrong (like, literally proven wrong -- not just disagreed with by a different expert for hire) I'll never trust another doc or hospital in my life. Seriously. Imo, he's the pinnacle and if he's wrong...well. But I have no doubt that he's correct.
jmo
I thought about that, but if it is pushed at all I have a feeling the hospital would then be accused of wanting to shut off the machine to harvest her organs.
The hospital did follow procedures. According to msm linked upthread there were two doctors affiliated with the hospital. Three brought in by the family who were not affiliated and one court ordered. That is six specialists who all came to the same conclusion Jahi is brain dead.
In msm links upthread Jahi's mother stated she wished she had not sought a second opinion regarding the surgery when the first opinion advised against it. I can't help but wonder if she will come to regret what appears to be doctor shopping in order to find someone who will differ from the six previous specialists who concluded she is brain dead. Her behavior and choices are going to have long term consequences for her other children. They will likely be teased or bullied regarding their mothers behavior and are likely to hear some graphic details regarding what happens to brain dead bodies kept on a ventilator. I really worry about how this long drawn out display will affect Jahi's siblings.
Very sad all around.
Cynthia Chiarappa, a hospital spokeswoman, has said officials would have to understand the capabilities of the New York facility before allowing a possible transfer.
The hospital also said it would need to confirm there is lawful transportation included in any transfer plan and there is written permission from the coroner.
Doctors at Childrens Hospital have refused to perform a tracheotomy for breathing and to insert a feeding tube procedures that would be necessary to transfer Jahi. The hospital has said its unethical to perform surgery on a person legally declared dead.
http://www.foxnews.com/health/2013/12/30/family-california-teen-declared-brain-dead-says-ny-facility-is-last-last-hope/The hospital has refused to perform a tracheotomy for breathing and insert a feeding tube, necessary procedures in order to transfer Jahi, saying it's unethical to perform surgery on a person legally declared dead...."We need to be able to talk to the other facility to understand what it is they are capable of doing," Cynthia Chiarappa, a hospital spokeswoman, said. "This is not transferring an individual in a vegetative state, but a dead body."
The hospital also said it would need to confirm there is "lawful transportation" included in any plan to transfer Jahi, and written permission from the coroner...The hospital's lawyer, Douglas Straus, said in a letter to Jahi's family on Sunday that the hospital has required three conditions to transfer Jahi, including assurance from the new facility.
They already did!!
Can her parents say no to organ donations? I am sure they have a choice, which is why I really don't understand this position.
Also, are her organs even okay for donation? I can't imagine the poor stress on Jahi's body at this point. It's almost been 3-weeks (for some reason I have to keep saying it's been 3-weeks!).
Whose quality of life? You think being attached to a machine with a dead brain has some life quality to it?