As ppl have noted, this particular legal procedure by Jahi's mom to force the hosp to keep Jahi on vent, etc. could end w. ---
--ct. order to hosp to keep her on vent indefinitely, and Jahi may 'die' (per mom's definition) while still on vent in hosp, in days, weeks, or perhaps months or yrs; or
-- ct order allowing hosp disconnect vent, and Jahi would 'die' (per mom's definition) in a matter of a few minutes or perhaps hours.
Either outcome for Jahi, mom, family, et al is tragic, whether that 'death' (per mom's definition) is sooner or later.
If the ct allows hosp to follow the CA statute and disconnect vent, I wonder how that will effect future behavior of--
-- patients,
-- parents & other family members,
-- other persons named by patient as H/C surrogate,
-- GALs,
-- attys considering rep'ing pt or fam for brain death situations.
IIRC before TRO action was filed, CHO spokewoman said there was "no policy' on brain-death situation and each is handled case by case.
IIRC someone posted link to a CA hosp policy stating that once brain death had bn determined, the vent
(and maybe other devices?) would be disconnected after a given period of time - 12 hours or 36 hours(?).
I wonder if CHO spoikeswoman's 'no policy' stmt was accurate.
If CHO actually had a 12 or 36 hr disconnect policy in place, I wonder if it was not disclosed to Jahi's fam,
in the hope that Jahi's mom would come to grips w her dau's brain-death as death.
Healing thoughts to all involved: Jahi, mom, other fam, the drs and other med care providers, hosp employees,
the other CHO patients and fams exposed to this sad situation.
JM2cts.