angelmom
The love stays...forever in our hearts
I just checked my FB page as I posted a link to the petition this am. One of my friends commented on my page that GZ worked for him for 3 years and was a nice guy, would help anybody out, not a racist, keep an open mind, yadda yadda.
I wasn't sure how to respond. How should one respond when someone defends a murderer?
Not sure if I'd respond at all, but make a mental note that this friend maybe isn't the best judge of character. Maybe. I'm just sayin'. Like, if he recommends a babysitter (or a neighborhood watch captain), you might choose to hire someone else. :innocent:
Since Zimmerman had moisture and grass all over his back, and a head injury to the back of his head, and bleeding from his nose, I think it's CLEAR he was in a physical confrontation and he was losing.
That may meet Florida's right to defend your life laws, I don't know. If I were in Zimmerman's position, I'd surely have used any weapon I had in my possession to survive.
He didn't have a head injury. He was checked and released from the hospital. Don't you think that if he had an actual injury the police would have been waving that all over the news? He had blood on the back of his head, probably from when he put his own hands to his head in the "What have I done?" position witnesses describe. It could have been Tray's blood, literally on his hands. Unfortunately we'll never know b/c the investigation was so minimal. The law says you have to be in reasonable fear for your life, not that you got your shirt dirty when you jumped an unarmed kid.
I am normally a staunch supporter of LE, but in this case, actually a 13 yr old who has seen a couple of episodes of CSI could have done a better job of investigating. They DID NOT take GZ for a drug and alcohol test even though that is SOP in any death, they did NOT make a photgraphic or get a Dr report on the injuries that GZ supposedly sustained, and there is evidence that they actively attempted to sway or change witness statements to make them more favorable to GZ. THEN they decided there was not enough evidece to take to the Prosecutor...They did a really really bad job, a shoddy job, maybe even wilful negligence, and very possible worse
They could not possibly have made a decision based on the evidence because they really didn't collect a great portion of the evidence.
EXACTLY. In fact, the crappy "investigation" may be the nail in GZ's coffin. If they had actually bothered to do any of these things, some of them may have come down on GZ's side of the story (GSR on his shirt, clean BAC/drug test, etc.) but now that it's too late people can speculate all day long. In fact, it won't surprise me at some point if GZ himself blames LE for not investigating further b/c the burden of proof is on him, and now he has nothing to work with.
When the police jump to conclusions, there are no winners. My gut has told me all along that GZ committed a murder here, but if I were a juror I'd want to see more evidence and would be frustrated. Normally that would work against the prosecutor, but in an affirmative defense case it actually penalizes the defense.