m00c0w
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2012
- Messages
- 3,316
- Reaction score
- 4,707
Any particular reason why you're listing off high-powered rifle rounds*? All of these rounds* inflict considerably more damage than a 9mm because of how they tumble. The 9mm round also has worse terminal ballistics than all of the listed calibers*, .40 S&W, .357 SIG, and .45 ACP. The size of the entrance wound isn't what causes the bleeding; it's the size of the wound cavity. This also depends on the type of ammunition that was used. If he was using FMJs, the round probably would have passed cleanly through. If he was using JHPs, there may not have even been an exit wound.9mm is a big bullet and they make a big exit wound. It is bigger then all the bellow bullets except for the 50cal.
.50 BMG Rimless and Bottleneck 5.45 in / 138 mm Machine guns and sniper rifles 0.51 in / 12.95 mm
.308 Winchester Rimless and bottleneck 2.800 in / 71.1 mm Police sharp shooting and short action rifles 0.308 in / 7.8 mm
3 7.62 x 39 mm Rimless 2.205 in / 56.00 mm Common rifles 0.311 in / 7.89 m
4 5.56 x 45mm NATO Rimless and bottleneck 2.260 in / 57.40 mm M16 assault rifles 0.224 in / 5.7 mm
.22 LR Rim fire and straight 0.985 in / 25.0 mm Pistols and Revolvers 0.222 in / 5.6 mm
*.22LR would not apply to these statements.