dixiegirl1035
I will do it, but I won't like it
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2017
- Messages
- 12,887
- Reaction score
- 99,736
This is my very first post, and I don’t know how to quote something. But - as to why the jury wants to know whether DM was wearing a seatbelt, I think it goes back to the evidence we heard on Day 1 or 2 from the ballistics expert. One of the assumptions he made was that DM was sitting upright, and then the shooter would have been a tall person based on the angle. If DM was wearing a seatbelt, he was likely upright.
Welcome! Great first post as to getting insight.
That makes perfect sense now why that question was asked. Personally, I had never thought of that was the reason it was asked but it makes perfect sense.