Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
GC was arguing about all the changing defense arguments in the numerous trials, including Katie's trial. Rash then objected -- I think to the fact that GC referred to what happened in Katie's trial. After the sidebar, GC moved on and didn't refer to Katie's trial again. So I think Rash's objection was sustained. JMO.I am watching at work and Georgia was closing and mentioned Katie and Rash objected and now we have the Seal. I assume they sidebarred - then maybe a break? What happened?
I think she should’ve brought out some of the quotes, particularly “it wouldn’t bring Dan back,” and “someone almost ran over my puppy.” Those are telling.The fact that there is no remorse or sympathy apparent over Dan's murder from any of the A's would be shocking if I didn't believe they themselves had him murdered. That's not forgetting the trauma the murder has caused the children. They seem to just want their way at all costs in spite of who is damaged by their actions. What a wretched family.
. . . the pieces that don't fit. Sorry, Charlie, they do fit. You are going down!Ugh. The puzzle.
I don’t think he can be cleaned up. He just has the swarmy look. LolAnd why the heck didn't they clean him up for the trial. Why couldn't his attorney see to it that he had a shearing. His hair is a mess.
Right!!! So obvious! They are doing this because they fear an arrest I think.They sure are trying to keep WA out of harms way. Shouldn't Rash be focused on CA.
At least for KM and LR I believe so, as they were in inmate attire & were asked if currently incarcerated. I’m not as sure on if they knows SG being incarcerated, at least not if it came from anything the State mentioned or brought out via a witness. Someone else may remember better than I if they commented on it, some of this trial has started to blur with the others for me but JMOSorry to ask as I should know this, but does the jury know that the 3 amigoes were convicted at trial? I only wonder because GC getting objected to when she mentioned Katie's trial.
I think they do know. I recall hearing that early in the trial. But I don't think they know what all the arguments/defenses were at the various trials.Sorry to ask as I should know this, but does the jury know that the 3 amigoes were convicted at trial? I only wonder because GC getting objected to when she mentioned Katie's trial.