While I would like the Whole Justice For Dan Markel to materialize, I respect the principle of “presumption of innocence” for all suspects. I respect the bases of the “common law and civil law” legal systems of the US, and also the Art. 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, under which the accused is “innocent until proven guilty”. Hence, public discussions of suspicions of crime should be within some degree of privacy for the suspects, IMHO.
Both Donna and Wendi Adelson were labeled as unindicted co-conspirators in the PCA leading to Charles Adelson’s arrest in April 2022. The November 2023 PCA and Grand Jury indictment include a non bondable first degree felony murder in Donna Adelson’s case. Still, Donna is “presumed innocent” until the burden of proof to provide compelling evidence of guilt to the Jury is carried out by The SAO2FL. Hence, I believe Donna Adelson should be set free on bail if mere technicality causes harm to her rights for a speedy trial. That is why it is believed that she remains in jail for at least 148 more days beyond the legal 175 days because of her own self interests.
In the same vein, I support affording Wendi Adelson a decent degree of privacy given that she has not been indicted, albeit labeled as co-conspirator in the murder of her ex-husband. Therefore, we do not discuss in public fora such as ws about her home address, her place of employment, her job title, the names of her close coworkers, and any info about other business entities she derives revenue from, albeit all of these pieces of info are readily available in the public domain.
Suspicions were on Harvey Adelson the very week of Dan Markel’s funeral. Tamara Demko’s interview with TPD provides a synopsis of the feelings of Dan Markel’s FSU circle at that time. It is believed that Harvey is equally under investigation. A couple of ASW permitted the holding and search of some of Harvey Adelson’s electronic devices thus far. Harvey has not been labeled as co-conspirator in the murder of his daughter’s ex-husband. That is why a large degree of privacy is afforded to him, IMHO.
At least for the older of Wendi’s two children, observable Internet activities indicate access to all of the public discussions (some of which fairly silly) of the legal predicaments pertaining to their family, if they want to do so. However, we should afford them a decent degree of privacy. And we should refrain from discussing or speculating about these children, because they are minor victims of their Abba’s murder, IMHO.
Again, I would like the Whole Justice For Dan Markel to materialize. Therefore, discussions of the circumstantial or material evidences from the court or from wannabe legal pundits such as from YT pointing to any of the Adelson’s alleged criminal involvement are fair games. Moreover, sleuthing for “physical evidence” against Donna, Wendi, and Harvey is reasonable and important. After all, many egregious violent crimes have been solved with the help of the public in the US.