FL - FSU Law Professor Dan Markel Murdered by Hitmen *4 Guilty* #23

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I believe this is a picture of the family at the wedding. Wendi's eyes don't look blue to me, but it may just be a trick of light.
1725007929033.png



Also, I'm sure I'm not the first person to note the unnaturally blue eye on the cover of Wendi's novel. Whether or not her eyes are actually blue, she definitely has some kind of hang up about it. A psychoanalyst would have a field day.
1725007740392.png
 
Now we're at the stage in 2024 where the Defense is seeking to exclude all evidence of family wealth. It's in the new motions.
Rashbaum/Morris are claiming that this is tantamount to ' class bias ' ( see below)
DA's sitting there in her cell, smug as can be, because she has this genius of a lawyer. Fast forward 1 month as she's ruminating over her life sentence realising she got screwed over by someone who is nothing more than a grifter with a law degree....
 
snipped

I have never seen that channel/show but I have seen that wedding video elsewhere.
Nonetheless, how could the host know for sure without knowing WA very well ?

OFC it's certainly possible* WA naturally has teal-coloured eyes but do you remember ABC's 20/20 ? They showed old family photos, here's one of them


View attachment 527902

* re ' possible'
6% according to this link on genetics: Eye Color Genetics - All About Vision.
The wedding video that the dental hygienist shared on a channel.
I’m assuming since the woman from Darklivity is from S Florida, she may know her? or know someone who does?
She happened to be right! No idea why her eyes looked brown in that photo.
I don’t think eyes can change from blue at 5 to brown at 8.
 
Last edited:
snipped

I have never seen that channel/show but I have seen that wedding video elsewhere.
Nonetheless, how could the host know for sure without knowing WA very well ?

OFC it's certainly possible* WA naturally has teal-coloured eyes but do you remember ABC's 20/20 ? They showed old family photos, here's one of them


View attachment 527902

* re ' possible'
6% according to this link on genetics: Eye Color Genetics - All About Vision.
She was right about her eyes being blue. Look at the video some dental hygienist put on a channel. I know some channels cant be mentioned here.
Everyone was discussing that W’s eyes were really blue.
If you know the video, then you had to have seen it yourself, right?

The wedding is not Robert’s wedding.
It’s a wedding the Adelsons attended (not Donna) where Harvey brought Wendi and Charlie.
His dental hygienist at the time invited the family.

Wendi was about 5 and her eyes were bright blue.
The file is too large for me to post here. I tried. I took a screenshot from the video.
I was actually surprised bc everyone said she had brown eyes.And was just making them appear blue with the contacts, “One murderer and one unindicted co conspirator” is the title-a month ago

Go on Patty N’s channel. She’s the hygienist. At the 19 second mark on the wedding video you will see Wendi there.
 
Last edited:
I believe this is a picture of the family at the wedding. Wendi's eyes don't look blue to me, but it may just be a trick of light.
View attachment 527906



Also, I'm sure I'm not the first person to note the unnaturally blue eye on the cover of Wendi's novel. Whether or not her eyes are actually blue, she definitely has some kind of hang up about it. A psychoanalyst would have a field day.
View attachment 527905
The wedding Im taking about is a wedding video from a hygienist who was on a channel called “Patty N.” Where she showed her wedding video. HI think.

Go on Patty N. Channel and at the 19 second mark you will see Wendi at the wedding as a child. Look at her eyes.
“One murderer and one unindicted co-conspirator” title of the video- a month ago,
 
Last edited:
I believe this is a picture of the family at the wedding. Wendi's eyes don't look blue to me, but it may just be a trick of light.
View attachment 527906



Also, I'm sure I'm not the first person to note the unnaturally blue eye on the cover of Wendi's novel. Whether or not her eyes are actually blue, she definitely has some kind of hang up about it. A psychoanalyst would have a field day.
View attachment 527905
Her eyes look lighter to me than those of the rest of the family in that picture. To me they look like they’re a different color than brown.
 
DA's sitting there in her cell, smug as can be, because she has this genius of a lawyer. Fast forward 1 month as she's ruminating over her life sentence realising she got screwed over by someone who is nothing more than a grifter with a law degree....
Am getting ahead of myself but....am imagining Charlie sitting in his cell in a couple of months after Donna's conviction


Quoting Peter Schorsch because he's covered the Adelsons well. ( link is a year old)

' How did Wendi’s relocation problem turn into something that Charlie would compromise his own life to solve? How can Wendi move on with her own life — perhaps even becoming the trustee of the family’s millions, largely earned by Charlie himself — while Charlie’s biggest satisfaction will now come from a limited prison commissary?

These are questions Charlie will now have the rest of his life to contemplate. Or rather, the rest of his life, plus 60 years in whatever version of the afterlife follows.'

 
The wedding video that the dental hygienist shared on a channel.
I’m assuming since the woman from Darklivity is from S Florida, she may know her? or know someone who does?
She happened to be right! No idea why her eyes looked brown in that photo.
I don’t think eyes can change from blue at 5 to brown at 8.
Yes I have seen the amateur video from the dental worker's old wedding video. ( I was saying that I haven't seen this ' 'Darklivity' person's channel)

You can't trust amateur photography or video.

Have a look at some photos of yourself or your family , especially night time snaps. Exposure, artificial lighting,day/night settings, color balance all have an impact
Portrait photographers ensure faithful color rendition of the subject for the paying customer by controlling all those factors

But don't rely on my word - google is an option
 
Friday, August 30th:
*Motions Hearing (@ 9am ET) - FL - Daniel Eric Markel (41) (shot to death July 18, 2014, Tallahassee) - *Donna Sue Adelson (73/now 74) arrested by FBI @ Miami Intl. Airport (11/13/23) on out-of-County warrant from Leon County arrest Warrant #FW231o2353 & indicted (11/15/23), charged (11/21/23) & arraigned (12/11/23) with 1st degree murder, conspiracy to commit 1st degree murder & solicitation to commit 1st degree murder. No bond. Held at Miami-Dade County Jail (Turner Guilford Knight Correctional Center. Leon County has 15 days to extradite from Miami-Dade County). Transferred from Miami-Dade to Leon County on 11/20/23. Held without bond (murder), $25K (conspiracy) & $25K (solicitation) on 11/21/23. Plead not guilty. Leon County
Jury selection set to begin on 9/17/24. (3-4 days)
Trial set to begin on 9/23/24.
Leon County Circuit Judge Stephen S. Everett. Prosecutor Georgia Cappelman & Assistant State attorney Sarah Dugan. Defense attorney Robert Alexander Morris & Daniel Rashbaum.

Case & Court info from 11/13/23 thru 8/12/24 reference post #748 here:
https://www.websleuths.com/forums/t...murdered-by-hitmen-4-guilty-23.715216/page-38

8/20/24 Update: Adelson's attorney files Motion to dismiss-says 9 year delay fundamentally unfair & her case should be dismissed. Final pretrial hearing on 9/12/24 @ 9am. 8/27/24 Docket update: [138] Amended: Answer to Demand for Discovery filed by State. See post #837, page 43, thread #23 for more info. [136, 137, 139 & 140] Motion hearing set on 8/30/24 @ 9am via Zoom for Adelson. 8/27/24: [141] Order vacating amended Order. Amended order granting unopposed Motion to modify trial date, 8/21/24 is hereby vacated. Jury selection shall begin on Tuesday, 9/17/24 @ 8:30am by Judge Stephen Everett.
8/28/24 Docket update: [143] Notice of Taking Deposition of Lisa Schelbe & Jim Lewis. [post #886]. [142] Letter from Josephine Potuto. 8/28/24 Docket update: Defendant Adelson's Motion in Limine directed to the testimony of Sergeant Christopher Corbitt & related summary exhibit.
 
Yes I have seen the amateur video from the dental worker's old wedding video. ( I was saying that I haven't seen this ' 'Darklivity' person's channel)

You can't trust amateur photography or video.

Have a look at some photos of yourself or your family , especially night time snaps. Exposure, artificial lighting,day/night settings, color balance all have an impact
Portrait photographers ensure faithful color rendition of the subject for the paying customer by controlling all those factors

But don't rely on my word - google is an option
Charlies eyes are hazel in the video. Not blue but OK. Google isnt necessary but thanks.
 
Am getting ahead of myself but....am imagining Charlie sitting in his cell in a couple of months after Donna's conviction


Quoting Peter Schorsch because he's covered the Adelsons well. ( link is a year old)

' How did Wendi’s relocation problem turn into something that Charlie would compromise his own life to solve? How can Wendi move on with her own life — perhaps even becoming the trustee of the family’s millions, largely earned by Charlie himself — while Charlie’s biggest satisfaction will now come from a limited prison commissary?

These are questions Charlie will now have the rest of his life to contemplate. Or rather, the rest of his life, plus 60 years in whatever version of the afterlife follows.'

These motions seem to me to be well written and researched, perhaps with the help of appellate counsel. If the defense prevails, the state will have a much more difficult time making its case, in my opinion, though they will still have the bump tapes and the emails. It’s interesting that Rash raised none of this at Charlie ‘s trial. To me, Donna seems to have reserved the best legal representation for herself, in keeping with what I believe was the family’s plan all along to let Charlie take the fall and flee in the event he was convicted. The family, as far as I know, has the resources to hire attorneys to come up with good legal arguments to exclude the most damaging evidence, and yet it appears to me that they didn’t in Charlie’s case. The defense was provided with all of the evidence the state planned to use in Charlie’s trial, pursuant to discovery rules, and so the argument that the defense was surprised by any of it and didn’t have time to come up with the arguments it is making now, doesn’t fly, for me. Perhaps the defense might have been surprised by how persuasive the evidence was for the jury. Also, for Charlie’s trial, the family hired only Rashbaum and those jury consultants. For Donna, I think it’s likely that they have brought in some bigger guns, I believe, including possibly Charlie’s appellate counsel, who may be preparing to represent Donna on appeal as well should that be necessary.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
244
Guests online
327
Total visitors
571

Forum statistics

Threads
608,670
Messages
18,243,715
Members
234,418
Latest member
May4th to Feb13th Blessed
Back
Top