amicuscurie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2023
- Messages
- 1,895
- Reaction score
- 11,099
Again, the letters I’ve seen from Sig’s attorney do not, in my opinion, support your contention that he would have had to take Katie down with him, though that may be what he believed. To me, they seem to me to indicate that the state was willing to work out a deal with both of them, if he confessed to being the shooter. Of course, as the shooter, he would in my opinion have gotten more time, but he might have been able to secure a better sentence for himself, and even if he had to implicate Katie, he might have been able to help secure a deal for her (which may have been complete immunity) to save herself and their children. Why neither of them cooperated remains a mystery to me.Sigfredo has nothing to offer. I also doubt he had anything to offer prior to the first conviction unless he was willing to take Katie down with him and he clearly wasn’t willing to make that sacrifice. Sigfredo only knew whatever BS story Katie fed him. I seriously doubt, and I’d say with 99% certainty, he had any direct communication with anyone beyond the point of demarcation – Katie was the clear demarcation point between Charlie & the hitman. Even if you believe Katie’s story about the sealed envelope that Charlie gave her to be passed onto the hitman, he sill had no direct communication beyond the buffer. As far as Luis, he had no issues taking Katie down but his information was limited to what Sigfredo told him and had no information beyond the demarcation point. I believe the majority of Luis story is accurate but his initial proffer was close to two years after the murder and I wonder if his story is a combination of what he remembers and what he ‘learned’ after the fact.