It’s the same mug shot we’ve seen, isn’t it?
No it’s a new one. In the previous one his hair hadn’t been cut.
It’s the same mug shot we’ve seen, isn’t it?
Thought it was a ponytailNo it’s a new one. In the previous one his hair hadn’t been cut.
Which is why it's bizarre that they're not going with the story that DA and HA did visit CA. It could be easily dismissed as them visiting CA on the way to Tallahassee. Why lie about it when it's not particularly incriminating. But now that they've lied about it, it's very incriminating and really does reinforce the money drop off theory.The defense could always argue that his parents were just visiting and did not drop off any money, I suppose. At Charlie’s trial, I recall the defense attempted to claim she was not in fact outside his house, but this is a different trial and she is not bound by what was argued in that one. In my opinion if the defense were to deny that she stopped by at all, this might make a jury more likely to believe that she did drop off the money and is trying to hide that.