The defense could always argue that his parents were just visiting and did not drop off any money, I suppose. At Charlie’s trial, I recall the defense attempted to claim she was not in fact outside his house, but this is a different trial and she is not bound by what was argued in that one. In my opinion if the defense were to deny that she stopped by at all, this might make a jury more likely to believe that she did drop off the money and is trying to hide that.
