Now, Charles Adelson could have a ready made basis for appeal: incompetent / inadequate counsel.
The obvious conflict of interests potentially detrimental to him could justify Charles Adelson’s objection against Rashbaum conducting his cross examination in Donna Adelson’s trial for the same murder crime. What justify Charles Adelson’s objection against Rashbaum continuing representation of his mother? Under what circumstance does one defendant have the “rights” to object for another defendant’s representation?
One justifying circumstance for objecting against Rashbaum's continuing representation of his mother Donna Adelson would be the potential argument by Charles Adelson that the representation of Rashbaum in his case was incompetent.
Proof? Charles Adelson could make the argument as his lawyer Ms. Laurel Cornell Niles has made a representation in court on 9/17/2024 to the effect that there is not a written waiver of Charles Adelson’s 6th Amendment Rights because such waiver has not crossed his mind. And yet, Rashbaum evoked a verbal agreement that is not adequate to fulfill the need for proving 6th Amendment Rights waiver. Thereby, that is an example of Rashbaum not meeting the requirement of competent counsel.
Charles Adelson’s time for serving the Initial Brief of Appellant is due today 9/18/2024 at the District Court Of Appeal First Appellate District Of Florida.
Soon enough, we will see if poker player, expensive watch lover, money maker Daniel Rashbaum will be cited in Charles Adelson’s Initial Brief of Appellant!
Ps: Rashbaum does not wear the pictured Patek Phillippe but there is another picture of him wearing an expensive watch.
View attachment 532027