my goodness, it certianly feels like an agenda in here!
IMO, there is no way they weren't "friends" if they texted each other...I am willing to bet he had some knowledge and maybe some involvement or plans for future involvement - you just never know. If the FBI viewed him as a threat, so be it. and my goodness if I was wanted for questioning, I would not be playing hard ball with the FBI, my butt would be at the office clearing myself....but, gee, maybe he did have something to hide....
and if one can't see the necessary reasons why agents would need automatic weapons, well, I don't really know how to spell it out.
In any dialog about anything if one exchanges the word "agenda" for "conversation", differing thoughts, views, etc. one would be more accurate IMO. By that I mean one individual is not expressing their thoughts while another individual doing the same thing and it is called an "agenda"
. It iscalled a conversation!
Agenda IMO,means "items to be attended to."
Dialog is like differing points of view based on all kinds of stuff - age, gender, family history, life history, education history, vocational history etc. etc.
If the label "agenda" is to be used in this context then IMO both parties have an agenda.OR both parties are having a conversation.
I look at it at different world views in the context of each individual’s history - nothing more nothing less!
In this day age (see last night’s Verizon story!) if these guys had any meaningful relationship whatsoever by now we would have heard that they spoke 84 times from this date to this date from this location at this time.
Look at ALL the stuff we had on older and younger as the story played and social media and cell phones were all a big part of that. This kid never registered cause there is IMO nothing to register. They would have been able recognize one another in passing cause they had passed by one antoher a couple of times, trained at the same gym a couple of times.
The notion that two people who have each other’s phone numbers in their cell phone indicates some signfignant relationship is pulling at strings IMO...
If they were such great buds why did his name never come up before? In the training gym no one ever referred to this kid as a meaningful part of older life
.
They were both skilled proficient athletes. IMO, they spoke on this “vital” cell phone call to say hi, ask about his knee and surgery etc. (guess here) IMO IMO IMO
No relationship has ever been established between these two from the beginning. And pretty early on we learned of both older and Youngers relationships, the intensity of those relationships and the significance of them.
The deceased never was on older or younger radar, and vice versa older and younger were never in kids life (friends etc) .
It is called an
"Acquaintance".
This kid came on the radar late, too late IMO. They had worked out a couple of times by being in the gym at the same time, and said hey how ya doing on a cell phone call ………………………
There are NO cell phone records indicating any interaction with both spheres of relationships etc. ANd , if there had been we would have heard a lot more about it, in much greater depth,in terms of frequency of contact, number of calls, facebook connections, twitter connections etc.
NOTHING!
Meaningless and overplayed IMO.
