It makes me want rail against the injustice. They need to go back and look again. I think they must have missed something.
In the Unconcluded podcast devoted to the searches of Jennifer, it brought to light the fact that Jenn had only been missing about two weeks when law enforcement began doing searches resulting from psychics tips. Now, they tried to polish that up by saying sometimes a person will tell something to a psychic hoping the psychic will alert law enforcement as the original person wants to remain anonymous.
To me, all the beautifully spun bull doesn't hide the fact they were desperate at that point. They had nothing.
But why?
Here is something that I roll around in my thoughts sometimes:
Law enforcement only made the briefest of appearances at Jennifer's place of work in 2006. They seized her work computer, (as well as her desktop from her condo). They conducted at least a few perfunctory interviews with co-workers, and that was that. Sure, I'm taking into account that they were probably operating under the impression that Jennifer never even made it to her vehicle on the morning of the 24th.
Keep in mind the last person to technically visually see Jennifer was her boss. They walked out of the building together around 6 pm and wished each other a good evening.
Okay, all is peachy. Hopefully, LE at least gave him one of the cursory interviews.
Now fast forward to the next morning when Jennifer doesn't show up for work. Taking into account that Jennifer was well regarded as an excellent and hardworking employee, she had recently had occasion to take some personal time to deal with a few issues regarding her condo. Why would their mind go immediately to something was so wrong that they had to notify Jennifer's emergency contact?
Jennifer was 24-years-old at the time. Even if she did miss an important meeting, I would have been worried about overstepping boundaries. With hindsight, of course, they did a good thing.
But still, usually when a person's place of work resorts to notifying an emergency contact, it is because law enforcement is standing in front of them explaining there has been a terrible tragedy.
But, nope, in this case we have the employer of a 24-year-old woman calling her mother who lived in another city informing her that her daughter was late for work.
Then a $1,000,000 reward for Jennifer's safe return is offered. I believe I read somewhere that it was Jennifer's employer who actually put the money up for it. That's a lot of money, even if the reward was only offered for a specific time period. If it's true about the backer of the reward, one would have to think they cared a great deal, right? Is there an "or" there?
So, that was pretty much it until 2010 when all of a sudden law enforcement shows up on Jennifer's employer's doorstep again. Only this time they are a little more serious, and do more in depth interviews. For what caused this sudden renewal of LE's interest, I'll link a podcast from Unconcluded as I'm not sure how much we can mention about these circumstances.
See video at about 12:23 minutes in:
https://audioboom.com/posts/6063896-on-the-radar
Yikes, this comment is getting way too long--I'll try to cut to my point: When LE showed up the first time within days of Jennifer's disappearance to the place where everyone was so concerned that they notified Jennifer's parents within hours of her absence, where were their voices in 2006? Where are there voices today?
What is the truth about what was going on there, and why couldn't law enforcement have ferreted this out in 2006.
They might have found a better lead than the psychics tips, maybe?